Advanced Search Results

Baljit Kumar, Trading as Grand Foundry, Punjab Vs. Ram Saroop and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 56(2)

Reported in : AIR1972Delhi153

Advocate for Respondent : Anoop Singh, Adv.

1. This appeal under Section 109 of the Trade an Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed in the following circumstances:Baljit Kumar-appellant was allotted factory No.77 situated on G.T.Road, Batala,...

Shakti NaraIn Singh Vs. Anoop Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2046; (2004)3UPLBEC2444

Advocate for Respondent : W.H. Khan and ;Brajesh Singh, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 27.2.2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Banda.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the impugned...

Mohan MeakIn Breweries Ltd. Vs. the Scotch Whisky Association

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT466

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Anoop Singh

O.N. Vohra, J.(1) The short point that arises for determination in this appeal is whether the brand name 'Highland Chief used in relation to the product described as 'Malted Whisky' along with a device of the...

Jugmug Electric and Radio Co. Vs. Telerad Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi252; ILR1977Delhi295; 1977RLR131

B.C. Misra, J.(1) This first appeal under section 109(6) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 43 of 1958, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been filed by the appellants against the order of the...

Drugdeal Corporation Vs. Smith

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 32

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT313

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anoop Singh

ORDER21 rule 32 only prescribes the mode for the execution of a decree for injnction. If a court is moved to enforce execution of the decree under this provisn of law the application must be made...

B. Chawla and Sons Vs. Bright Auto Industries

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1981Delhi95; 19(1981)DLT323; 1981RLR373

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anoop Singh

O.N. Vohra, J.(1) The short point arising in this appeal against the judgment dated December 24, 1976 of M. S. Joshi, J. is : Whether the design of M/s. B. Chawla & Sons, hereinafter referred to...

Ratan and Co. Vs. P. Narayanan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 21, 97 and 109(2)

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi93

Advocate for Respondent : Anoop Singh and ; B.S. Narang, Advs.

1. These are two appeals against the orders of the Assistant Registrar.2. The undisputed facts are these. On 5th October, 1966 the appellants Messrs. Rattan & Co. filed an application bearing No. 238044-B to register the...

Kanwaljit Singh Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention and Corruption Act - Sections 7 and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT280; 2007(95)DRJ439

Advocate for Respondent : Richa Kapoor and ; Sukriti Bhardwaj, Advs.

Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.1. These two appeals have been preferred against the judgment dated 16.1.2007 and order on 'sentence' of the same day, whereby the learned Special Judge under Prevention and Corruption Act(in short ?the Act?),...

E.R. Squibb and Sons Inc. Vs. Curewel India Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi197; ILR1986Delhi362

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. L. C. Goyle

C. Goel, J.(1) The plaintiff, E. R. Squibb & Sons Inc. filed this suit against the defendant, Curewel (India) Ltd. for a permanent injunction against the defendant restraining it from selling in any manner its product...

Ravinder Kumar Gupta Vs. Ravi Raj Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Design Act, 1911 - Sections 51A

Reported in : 1986(1)ARBLR473(Delhi); 29(1986)DLT190; 1986RLR93

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.R. Gupta

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) This is a petition under section 51-A of the Designs Act, 1911 (for short the 'Act') for cancellation of design No. 150873 in class 4by the Controller of Patents and Designs who...