Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: anjali banerjee · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 24 2003

Shyam Narayan Chouksey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2003

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 51A; Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5A

Reported in : AIR2003MP233; 2004(3)MPLJ216

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Patel, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Nos. 1 and 2, ;Anjali Banerjee, Adv. for No. 3, ;Surendera Singh, Sr. Counsel, for Nos. 4 and 5 and ;S.K. Yadav, Amicus Curiae

Dipak Misra, J.1. In the days of yore it was vocally pronounced with immense emphasis that a drum beat may travel to a maximum limit of four miles but the utterances made by one man, through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2004

Baldeo Prasad Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Financial Code - Rule 84; Service Law

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR478]; 2004(2)MPHT250; 2004(2)MPLJ536

Advocate for Respondent : Anjali Banerjee, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1.The petitioner was appointed in the post of Patwari on 3-9-1964. Vide order dated 2-3-1996 he was compulsorily retired. The order was passed on 1-3-1996 asking the petitioner to handover the charge. It is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2003

Harmit Singh Bhatia Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Tendu Patta (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 14(6); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Forest Act

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT101

Advocate for Respondent : Anjali Banerjee, Govt. Adv.

ORDERK.K. Lahoti, J.1. The petitioner aggrieved by the orders passed (a) competent authority and Deputy Divisional Forest Officer, South Sagar Annexure P-9, (b) appellate authority-cum-Conservator of Forest, Sagar Circle Annexure P-10 and (c) the Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 11 2002

Smt. Mamta Pateria and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-11-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 41 and 42; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 40, 47(1), 47(4), 47(4A), 91, 94, 95(1) and 100; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 44(2), 50 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 - Rule 5, 5(1), 5(9), 9; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi Recruitment and Condition of Service Rules, 1997 - Rules 2 and 5; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Members (Nomination of Representative) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT76; 2002(4)MPLJ196

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Mishra, ;Sameer Beohar, ;Praveen Verma, ;Rajendra Tiwari and ;Anjali Banerjee, Advs.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. These four writ petitions pertain to validity of selection of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, made by Janpad Panchayat, Rajnagar in the year 1998.2. The case has chequered history. The Collector, Chhatarpur as per order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2008

Avinash Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-22-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT482

ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. Petitioner is an NGO registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and Dr. Harish Bhalla, a leading de-addiction expert in India is its Honorary Secretary. The petitioner has filed this writ petition as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2007

Pooran Lal and anr. Vs. Amratlal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2008ACJ2795

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Anjali Banerjee

K.S. Chauhan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred being aggrieved by the award dated 31.1.2005 passed by Second Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Katni in Claim Case No. 159 of 2004, whereby the claim petition of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Subir Das @ Bapi Das and Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 326 and 398A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN231

Advocate for Respondent : Ashim Kr. Roy and ;Joy Sengupta, Advs.

Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 15th February, 2000, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore in Sessions Trial No. 4(6) of 1999,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2013

Sharad Kumar Sahu Vs. Prahlad

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-02-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Anjali Banerjee

M.A. No. 1726 of 2011 2.5.2013 Shri L.L. Prajapati, learned counsel for appellant. Ms. Anjali Banerjee, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. None for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Heard. This appeal under Section 173, Motor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2013

The United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Kiran Bai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

The United India Insurance Co.LTD.versus Smt. Kiran Bai and others.R.P. No.576/13 17/07/13 Ku. Anjali Banerjee, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned counsel for the claimants on advance notice. On being apprised of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2013

Pramod Kumar Sharma Vs. Om Prakash Yadav

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 M.C.C. NO.926/2013. 29.7.2013. Shri A.K.Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants. Ku. Anjali Banerjee, learned standing counsel for respondent No.3/ Insurance Company. Heard. This petition is preferred on behalf of the appellants/ claimants of M.A.No.592/2012 for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial