Advanced Search Results
Shyam Narayan Chouksey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-24-2003
Media and CommunicationConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 51A; Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5A
AIR2003MP233; 2004(3)MPLJ216
R.S. Patel, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Nos. 1 and 2, ;Anjali Banerjee, Adv. for No. 3, ;Surendera Singh, Sr. Counsel, for Nos. 4 and 5 and ;S.K. Yadav, Amicus Curiae
Dipak Misra, J.1. In the days of yore it was vocally pronounced with immense emphasis that a drum beat may travel to a maximum limit of four miles but the utterances made by one man, through...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldeo Prasad Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-03-2004
Service
Madhya Pradesh Financial Code - Rule 84; Service Law
[2004(102)FLR478]; 2004(2)MPHT250; 2004(2)MPLJ536
Anjali Banerjee, Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1.The petitioner was appointed in the post of Patwari on 3-9-1964. Vide order dated 2-3-1996 he was compulsorily retired. The order was passed on 1-3-1996 asking the petitioner to handover the charge. It is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarmit Singh Bhatia Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-28-2003
Commercial
Madhya Pradesh Tendu Patta (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 14(6); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Forest Act
2004(1)MPHT101
Anjali Banerjee, Govt. Adv.
ORDERK.K. Lahoti, J.1. The petitioner aggrieved by the orders passed (a) competent authority and Deputy Divisional Forest Officer, South Sagar Annexure P-9, (b) appellate authority-cum-Conservator of Forest, Sagar Circle Annexure P-10 and (c) the Sessions Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Mamta Pateria and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-11-2002
ServiceCivil
Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 41 and 42; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 40, 47(1), 47(4), 47(4A), 91, 94, 95(1) and 100; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 44(2), 50 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 - Rule 5, 5(1), 5(9), 9; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi Recruitment and Condition of Service Rules, 1997 - Rules 2 and 5; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Members (Nomination of Representative) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
2002(5)MPHT76; 2002(4)MPLJ196
Ajay Mishra, ;Sameer Beohar, ;Praveen Verma, ;Rajendra Tiwari and ;Anjali Banerjee, Advs.
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. These four writ petitions pertain to validity of selection of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, made by Janpad Panchayat, Rajnagar in the year 1998.2. The case has chequered history. The Collector, Chhatarpur as per order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvinash Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-22-2008
Civil
2008(4)MPHT482
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. Petitioner is an NGO registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and Dr. Harish Bhalla, a leading de-addiction expert in India is its Honorary Secretary. The petitioner has filed this writ petition as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPooran Lal and anr. Vs. Amratlal and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-04-2007
Motor Vehicles
2008ACJ2795
Ms. Anjali Banerjee
K.S. Chauhan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred being aggrieved by the award dated 31.1.2005 passed by Second Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Katni in Claim Case No. 159 of 2004, whereby the claim petition of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubir Das @ Bapi Das and Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Apr-18-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 326 and 398A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428
2006(4)CHN231
Ashim Kr. Roy and ;Joy Sengupta, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 15th February, 2000, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore in Sessions Trial No. 4(6) of 1999,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharad Kumar Sahu Vs. Prahlad
Madhya Pradesh
May-02-2013
Land Acquisition
Ms. Anjali Banerjee
M.A. No. 1726 of 2011 2.5.2013 Shri L.L. Prajapati, learned counsel for appellant. Ms. Anjali Banerjee, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. None for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Heard. This appeal under Section 173, Motor...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Kiran Bai
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-17-2013
Land Acquisition
The United India Insurance Co.LTD.versus Smt. Kiran Bai and others.R.P. No.576/13 17/07/13 Ku. Anjali Banerjee, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned counsel for the claimants on advance notice. On being apprised of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramod Kumar Sharma Vs. Om Prakash Yadav
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-29-2013
Land Acquisition
1 M.C.C. NO.926/2013. 29.7.2013. Shri A.K.Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants. Ku. Anjali Banerjee, learned standing counsel for respondent No.3/ Insurance Company. Heard. This petition is preferred on behalf of the appellants/ claimants of M.A.No.592/2012 for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »