Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: anindya kumar mitra · Page 1 of about 98 results (0.136 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 01 2011

Kanoria Jute and Industries Limited Vs. Saraf Agencies Private Limited

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-01-2011

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra; Mr. Abhrajit Mitra; Mr. Aniruddha Mitra; Ms. Urbi Roy, Advs.

1. This appeal is at the instance of a defendant in a suit for eviction, arrears of rent and mesne profit and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30th July, 2010 passed by a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2006

Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees for the ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-13-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 130, 131, 133, 135, 136, 171(7), 179 and 184; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Sections 59 to 66 and 66A to 66N

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN401

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Kumar Mitra and ;Surhid Roy Chowdhury, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. What would be the effective date of a revised valuation in respect of a port premises, is the moot question to be decided in this appeal.2. The Board of Trustees for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

Skanska International Civil Engineering Ab and anr. Vs. West Bengal St ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226

Reported in : (2001)2CALLT133(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra, Adv.

ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the decision of the West Bengal State Electricity Board being the respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as Board) rejected the tender submitted by the writ petitioner....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 19 2009

Jaideep Halwasiya Vs. Rasoi Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-19-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1A), 172, 173, 173(2) and 173(3); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : [2009]91SCL352(Cal),(2009)23VST20(NULL)

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Kumar Mitra, ;Abhrajit Mitra, ;Anirban Roy, ;A.K. Jhunjhunwala and ;Ratnanko Banerjee, Advs.

Dipankar Datta, J.1. All the three appeals being directed against the judgment and order dated 4-7-2008 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, they were heard together and shall be governed by this common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2006

Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ors. Vs. Damodar Ropeways and Const ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-23-2006

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Section 174 and 174(1)

Reported in : (2007)1CALLT634(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Kumar Mitra, ;Samit Talukdar and ;Arindam Banejee, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. Respondents were the owners of 8th floor of premises No. 11, Dr. U.N. Brambhachary Street, Calcutta measuring about 14100 sq.ft. The appellant, Corporation proposed the annual valuation at Rs. 35,31,600/- and informed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2012

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-22-2012

Subject : Property

Acts : Singur Land Rehabilitation & Development Act, 2011 - Sections 8, 9 ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 23, 3(a), 7, 24, 17, 50(2), 11A; Impugned Act - Sections 5(2), 3, 4(3); Singur Act. - Section 5(2); Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (BDA Act) - Section 36; Constitution Of India - Article 254, 254(1)

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. :1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and/or order dated 28th September, 2011. The appellants have challenged the Singur Land Rehabilitation & Development Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2012

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-22-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and/or order dated 28th September, 2011. The appellants have challenged the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Southern Hitech Capital Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-21-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction CA No.1047 of 2011 CP No.289 of 2009 SOUTHERN HI-TECH CAPITAL LTD.-VersusTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ORS.& CA No.439 of 2012 CP No.289 of 2009 M/S.CARRIT MORAN & COMPANY...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2009

University of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Pritam Rooj

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-2009

Subject : Right to InformationConstitution

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2) to (4), 6, 8, 8(1), 8(3), 10, 18, 18(3), 18(4) and 22; ;West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963; ;Evidence Act - Section 123; ;Freedom of Information Act, 2002; ;Official Secrets Act, 1923; ;West Bengal Right to Information Rules, 2006 - Rule 4; ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(2), 32, 141 and 142; ;West Bengal Board of Secondary (Examination) Regulations, 2001 - Regulations 14(1), 14(2) and 14(4)

Reported in : AIR2009Cal97

Advocate for Respondent : Satadal Chatterjee,; Tapas Majumder,; Sima Sengupta,; Susmita Biswas,; U.S. Menon and; R.N. Chakraborty, Advs.

Dipankar Datta, J.1. The broad issues raised in the writ petitions, registered as W.P. Nos. 208, 5302(W), 5743(W), 5744(W) and 18189(W), all of 2001 being identical to the issue involved in MAT No. 275 of 2008,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2017

Lindsay International Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Laxmi Niwas Mittal and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-17-2017

Subject : MRTP

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN G.A.No.174 of 2017 G.A.No.175 of 2017 G.A.No.176 of 2017 G.A.No.117 of 2017 C.S.No.2 of 2017 LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.&...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial