Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: anil kumar sett and · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 13 1969

Kanailal Manna and ors. Vs. Bhabataran Santra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-13-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1, 3 and 9

Reported in : AIR1970Cal99

Advocate for Respondent : Manindra Nath Ghose, ;Sudhanshu Kumar De and ;Anil Kumar Sett, Advs.

Anil K. Sen, J.1. This appeal from appellate decree is at the instance of defendant Nos. 4, 5 and 6 who are the transferees from defendant Nos. 2 and 3. The appeal arises out of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1984

Arabinda Guha Vs. Giribala Debi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-09-1984

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; ;West Bengal Acquisition and Settlement of Homdstead Land Act, 1969 - Section 13

Reported in : AIR1984Cal203

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Sett and ;Amar Nath Dhole, Advs.

ORDERRam Krishna Sharma, J. 1. This rule arises out of an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Arabinda Guha -- the petitioner owned and possessed some laud pertaining to Plot No. 1549...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2005

Uma Rani Sett and ors. Vs. Dipali Rani Sett and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-09-2005

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 376

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN373

Advocate for Respondent : Bidyut Kumar Banerjee, ;Jiban Ratan Chatterjee, ;Malay Kumar Das, ;Dipa Bhaduri and ;Bandana Chatterjee, Advs.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This first appeal is at the instance of the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31st May, 2004 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 1975

Apurba Chandra Sen Vs. Kamal Kumar Dutta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-06-1975

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Succesion Act, 1925 - Section 333

Reported in : AIR1976Cal62

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Sett and ;Bhaskar Ghose, Advs.

R. Bhattacharya, J. 1. This second appeal is by the defendant against the decision of the Additional District Judge in a Title Appeal, affirming the judgment and the decree passed in the original Title suit in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1982

Sukhamoy Roy Vs. Salilananda Basak and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-16-1982

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11 - Order 9, Rule 13; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13(6) and 17(3)

Reported in : AIR1983Cal83,86CWN1025

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Sett, Adv.

Sen, J.1. This is an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent by the tenant-defendant (hereinafter referred to as defendant) and it arises out of a suit for eviction which has been concurrently decreed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1967

Shree Nursing Timber Works and anr. Vs. Sm. Amala Bala Dassi

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-27-1967

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 17(1), 21 and 22; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 108(1); ;Contract Act - Section 38

Reported in : AIR1969Cal12,73CWN522

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Sett, Adv.

Arun K. Mukherjea, J. 1. These are two appeals by two tenants against a judgment dated December 17, 1959 of the Judge, 4th Bench of the Court of Small Causes, Calcutta, by which a decree of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1962

Tailors Priya, a Firm Vs. Gulabchand Danraj, a Firm

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-25-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rules 1 and 2; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 159; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 5, 13, 14, 123, 124, 129 and 130

Reported in : AIR1963Cal36

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Sett, Adv.

Bachawat, J. 1. On August 30, 1961, the plaintiff instituted a suit in the City Civil Court, Calcutta under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure claiming a decree on a dishonoured cheque dated 29th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1960

Kamal Kumar Nag Choudhury Vs. Parbati Charan Kundu and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-25-1960

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 18; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 90; ;Bengal Tenancy Act - Section 174(3)

Reported in : AIR1961Cal81,64CWN788

Advocate for Respondent : Manindranath Ghose and ;Anil Kumar Sett, Advs.

F.N. Mookerjee, J. 1. This is a reference under proviso (ii) to Rule 1 of Chapter II of the Appellate Side Rules and the point referred relates to extension of time under Section 18 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 1952

Bharat Chandra Maiti Vs. Gour Chandra Adak

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-29-1952

Subject : Constitution

Acts : West Bengal Bargadars Act, 1950 - Sections 7(1), 9(2) and 18; ;Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1953Cal95

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhangsu Kumar Dey and ;Anil Kumar Sett, Advs.

ORDERG.N. Das, J.1. This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff against an order of Mr. J. C. Chakravartty, learned Munsif, staying the plaintiff's suit under Section 9 (2) read with Section 18 of the West Bengal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1952

Surja Kumar Sardar Vs. Manmatha Nath Naskar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-11-1952

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 2 and 3; ;Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1953Cal200,56CWN845

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Sett and ;Ashutosh Ganguly, Advs.

K.C. Chunder, J. 1. This is an appeal against an appellate decree of the Subordinate Judge, Sixth Court, 24 Parganas, reversing that of the Munsif, Second Court, Baruipore. 2. It appears that the plaintiff who is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial