Advanced Search Results

Kailash Kumar and ors. Vs. R.L. Kapur

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)416; 54(1994)DLT342; 1994(29)DRJ234; 1994RLR387

P.K. Bahri, J. (1) These two appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated September 30, 1991, of the Rent Control Tribunal by which he had dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants and also...

State of H.P. Vs. Diwana and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3002

Advocate for Respondent : Anand Sharma and; Chhabil Dass, Advs.

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the acquittal of accused Diwana (A-1), Suffal alias Subhash (A-2), Prithi (A-3), Adalti (A-4) and Sukhia (A-5), by the Session Judge Kangra Division at Dharamsala in Sessions...

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Renu Acharya

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : II(1996)ACC72,1996ACJ746

Advocate for Respondent : K.D. Sood,; R.K. Sharma and; Anand Sharma, Advs.

S.N. Phukan, C.J.1. By this common judgment and order, we dispose of five appeals along with the connected cross-objections, registered as F.A.O. No. 19 of 1985 with Cross-Objection No. 153 of 1985, F.A.O. No. 56 of...

Shyam Lal Vs. Haru Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 10(2) and 149(2); ;Motor Vehicles Rules

Reported in : 2006ACJ749

Advocate for Respondent : Anand Sharma,; Tarlok Chauhan and; Deepak Bhasin, Ad

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. This is owner's appeal against the award dated 1.7.2002, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kullu, in Claim Petition No. 49 of 2001. Learned Tribunal below while recording findings on issue...

Rainbow Ezung Vs. Mhao Lotha and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 123

Advocate for Respondent : B. Gupta, P.C. Kataki, D.C. Goswami, D.K. Bhattacharyya, D.N. Choudhury, A.K. Phukan, R. Gogoi, A. Roy and S.K. Roychoudhury, Advs.

B.L. Hansaria, J. 1. 4 (Four) candidates were in the fray in this election from No. 38-Wokha Assembly Constituency in the State of Nagaland. The petitioner was a candidate of Congress(I), whereas respondent No. 1 (the...

Har NaraIn Vs. Vinod Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 141; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 151; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83, 123(2) and 123(4)

Reported in : AIR1987All319

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Tripathi and ;K.P. Singh, Advs.

ORDEROm Prakash, J. 1. The application A-59 has been made by the respondent under Order 6, Rule 16 and Section 151 C.P.C praying that the paragraphs Nos. 10, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25,...

Superintending Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). Heard Mr. Anand Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Award dated 20.5.2010 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Presiding Judge, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Dharamshala, H.P., in Reference No. 44 of 2007,...

Anand Sharma Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : October 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : October 29, 2014 + CRL.A.937/2012 ANAND SHARMA Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Samrat Nigam, Advocate versus...

Meera vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Tarang Srivastava, Mr. Tushar Nirwan, Mr. Akshay Ravi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 6/2026 MEERA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitij Gaur, Mr. Devanand Kumar, Mr. Shahdi Raza, Mr. Sachidanand, Ms. Simran Saba, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR...

Nasir Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Cr.R.No.2211/2012 20.3.2013 Shri Anand Naik, counsel for the applicants. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. As prayed by learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard finally. The applicants have challenged the order dated 2.11.2012...