Advanced Search Results
Anil Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors
Delhi
Sep-05-2017
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 05, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 7799/2017, CM Nos. 32194-32195/2017 ANIL KUMAR ANAND Through: In person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahiba Chadha Vs. Union Territory and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-24-1994
Constitution
(1995)109PLR606
Ashok Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. and; Subhash Goyal, Adv.
S.S. Grewal, J.1. In brief facts relevant for the disposal of this writ petition are that petitioner Sahiba Chadha was born in Chandigarh on 8th of January, 1977 and did her schooling at Chandigarh right from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s International Merchandising Company Llc (earlier Known As Internat ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-2022
Service Tax
CA353236/2020 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos 3532-3536 of 2020 M/s International Merchandising Company, Appellant LLC (Earlier Known as International Merchandising Corporation) Versus Commissioner, Service Tax, New Delhi Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ht Media Limited versus Principal Commissioner Delhi South Goods and S ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-2026
Service Tax
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 904
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 904 : 2026 INSC 66HT Media Limited v. Principal Commissioner Delhi South Goods and Service Tax (Civil Appeal No(s). 23525-23526 of 2017) 16 January 2026 [J.B. Pardiwala* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.]Issue for Consideration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjunath V. Jannu Vs. Latha M. Ralkar
Karnataka
Jan-25-1988
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3 and 34
ILR1989KAR2078
S. Shekhar Shetty, Adv.
K.A. Swami, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 26-9-1987 passed by the learned XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No. 2479 of 1987. The learned trial Judge has rejected I.A.III filed under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadangopal Vs. Narsingdas and Sons
Rajasthan
Aug-02-1950
Commercial
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 28 and 80
AIR1951Raj64
Amritraj, Adv.
Nawalkishore, C.J.1. This is a defendant's regular first appeal from the judgment of the learned District Judge decreeing the plaintiffs' suit for Rs. 5800 with costs.2. The various events in this case date back to 1941...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanpat Singh Vs. the State
Rajasthan
Oct-18-1965
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161
AIR1967Raj10; 1967CriLJ121
Amritraj Mehta, Dy. G.A.
I.N. Modi, J.1. Accused Ganpalsingh has been convicted of an offence under Section 161 I.P.C and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rupees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJethmal Singh and ors. Vs. Ranjeet Singh and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-13-1955
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3
AIR1957Raj171
Amritraj, Adv.
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is an application by the respondents of this appeal, and they pray that the appeal has abated as Dheersingh and Mangalsingh appellants died more than a year ago, and their legal representatives...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankerlal Vs. Poonamchand
Rajasthan
Nov-11-1953
Constitution
Law of Pre-emption in Marwar - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19 and 19(1)
AIR1954Raj232
Amritraj, Adv.
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an appeal by Shankerlal against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Jodhpur, in a pre-emption suit.2. The suit was brought by Poonam Chand for pre-emption with respect to the sale...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Rama
Rajasthan
Apr-02-1956
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 238
AIR1956Raj190; 1956CriLJ1430
Amritraj, Adv.
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the acquittal of Rama by the Sub-divisional Magistrate Ballabhnagar.2. The case for the prosecution was briefly this.3. Ghisulal, Sales Ameen, accompanied by a number of persons,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »