Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: amjad hussain · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.051 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 08 2013

Md HussaIn and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-08-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2457 o”1. Md. Hussain 2. Amzad Hussain @ Amjad Hussain.. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Manawar Hussain ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2014

Rajbir Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2014

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 16, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 451/1998 ISHWAR SINGH & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.D.C.Mathur, Sr.Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2014

Malabar Business Centre (P) Limited Vs. E.P.F. Appellate Tribunal and ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-10-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY,THE10H DAY OF MARCH201419TH PHALGUNA, 1935 WP(C).No. 9419 of 2011 (B) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MALABAR BUSINESS CENTRE (P) LIMITED, G.B.ROAD, PALGHAT, REPRESENTED...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 2001

M/S. Puran Chand JaIn Vs. Shri Shyamji Industries

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-2001

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)137; 91(2001)DLT288; 2001(2)RAJ234

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.L. Mangla and ; Mr Amjad Hussain, Advs.

ORDERJ.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Since the defendant through this application under order 39 Rule 4 CPC seeks vacation of ex parte ad interim injunction passed vide order dated 28th April, 2000 whereby the defendants were restrained...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2006

Dev Pharmacy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ozone Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-28-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 135

Reported in : 2006(33)PTC681(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Amjad Hussain, Adv.

Gita Mittal, J.1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiff who has asserted that its using the trade mark 'PERFECT' in respect of goods Manufactured by it and for which it has achieved a good...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2002

Shaikh Jabbar Abbas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR734; 2003(2)BomCR159; 2003BomCR(Cri)662; (2003)1BOMLR237; [2003(96)FLR606]; 2003(1)MhLj543

Advocate for Respondent : Suresh Kumar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;L.M. Jha, Adv. for respondent No. 4

R.M. Lodha, J. 1. The matter was posted today for confirmation of interim relief but in the light of the objection taken by the respondents that petitioner has adequate and efficacious remedy of challenging the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1989

Aktar Sakeena Vs. Government of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-03-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2373

Advocate for Respondent : Shylendrakumar, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R-1 and ;S.V. Narasimhan, Govt. Adv. for R-2

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J.1. Amjad Hussain was detained under the provisions of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 ('the Act') by an order dated 8-10-1988. His mother has filed this petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1954

Narsingh Das and ors. Vs. Mian Safiullah Sha

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-24-1954

Subject : Property

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 53, 56 and 60

Reported in : AIR1954All773

Advocate for Respondent : Niamatullah and ;Ali Hasan, Advs.

Chaturvedi, J. 1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit for possession.2. The suit was filed in the Court of the Civil Judge of Bahraich by the plaintiff in his capacity as Sajjadanashin...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1957

Manoolal Balchand Vs. Kaluram Gulabchand

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-1957

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52, 56, 59 and 60

Reported in : AIR1958MP343

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Tare, Adv.

B.K. Chaturvedi, J.1. This is plaintiff's second appeal against a decree dated 27-8-1952 of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Hoshangabad, reversing a decree of the Civil Judge, Class II, Hoshangabad. The plaintiff's case is that on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2016

The Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. rep. by its Vi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Y. Chandrasekhar, Sri. Y.Chandrasekhar

Common Judgment: (Ramesh Ranganathan, J.) CCCA No.104 of 2002 has been filed by the A.P. Mineral Development Corporation Limited against the judgment and decree passed by the II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial