Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: amit lahiri · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.023 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 31 2008

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Kinkar Karmakar and ors. and Lutfar ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-31-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal Home Guard Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 6, 8 and 9; ;West Bengal Home Guards Act, 1990 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14-16, 21, 23 and 226; ;Home Guard Rules, 1962 - Rule 4

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT315(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Joyanta Kumar Mitra and ;Tulsidas Roy, Advs. in FMA No. 588 of 2002, ;Jonardan Mondal, Adv. for Respondent No. 5

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The respondents/writ petitioners were enrolled from time to time as home guards under the West Bengal Home Guard Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act of 1962'. They approached this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1987

Tapankumar Chatterjee Vs. Smt. Kamala Chatterjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-30-1987

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1), 13 and 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Cal74

Advocate for Respondent : Amit Lahiri, Adv.

Ajit Kumar Nayak, J.1. This appeal is directed at the instance of petitioner-husband against the judgment and decree dt. 12-11-1979 passed by Shree S. K. Basu, learned Additional District Judge, First Court, Hooghly, in Matrimonial Suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1987

Benoy Krishna Tewary and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1987

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 1976

Reported in : AIR1987Cal190,91CWN1074

Advocate for Respondent : A.N. Banerjee and ;Amit Lahiri, Advs. for Respondent No. 1

A.M. Bhattacharjee, J.1. Thetrial court having decreed the suit for partition on the finding that the suit-properties are Mitakshara coparcenery properties and the appellate court having dismissed the suit on reversal of the finding, the only...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 28 2005

M.N. Dastur and Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-28-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(13), 65(48), 66, 68, 68(2) and 81; ;Central Excise Act; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 2(42); ;Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944; ;Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Section 4; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 3(1); ;Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964; ;Income Tax Act; ;Bihar Land Reforms Act - Section 2(O); ;Service Tax Law - Section 65; ;Service-tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 6 and 6(1)

Reported in : [2005]128CompCas618(Cal),(2005)197CTR(Cal)633,2006[4]STR3

Advocate for Respondent : Kalyan Bandopadhyay and ;Amit Lahiri, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.The question :1. The short question raised by Dr. Pal in this appeal is as to whether the expression 'engineering firm' used in the definition of consulting engineer in Section 65(13) of the Finance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial