Advanced Search Results

Amit Raj Enterprises and ors. Vs. Uco Bank and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Banking

Acts : Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Sections 13(2) and 13(4)

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR894; [2007(4)JCR501(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Rajen Raj, Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Rajen Raj, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents UCO Bank and with their consent, this application is being disposed of at...

Bhartendu Singh @ Murari and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 307, 323 and 448

Reported in : 2005(3)BLJR1731; 2006CriLJ772; [2005(4)JCR115(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Kashyap, Adv.

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard Mr. Sen, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Kashyap, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties.2. This revision is against the order dated 3/4/2003 passed by the Ist Additional District...

Rakesh Kiran, Vs. Ranchi University, Through Its Vice Chancellor and o ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR342(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned Counsel appearing for the Ranchi University.2. In this writ application, the petitioners have prayed for the following...

Hari Bansh Pandey Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR124(Jhr)]

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned J.C. to G.A. appearing for the State of Bihar are present. However, Mr. H.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel No. 1, appearing for the State of...

Dineshwar Singh Vs. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Laws; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR340(Jhr)]

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the State of Bihar as well as the State of Jharkhand as party respondent in this writ application. Learned counsel for the petitioner is...

Sunil Kumar Das Vs. Bihar School Examination Board and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR330

Advocate for Respondent : Amareshwar Sahay, Adv.

ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. In both the cases as common prayer made for publication of result of primary teachers training examination, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The...

Bhola Prasad Chaudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR313(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.J. Rahman, J.C. to G.P. II and; S. Shrivastava, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 to 6

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application are the following :--(1) To quash Annexure-3 dated 21.10.2002, whereby the time bound promotion given to the petitioner with effect from 01.04.1981 in the...

Ram Prasad Mistri and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 304-II

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR107(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Md. Hatim, APP

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1.5.2003 and 2.5.2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Fast Track Court III, Garhwa, in Sessions Trial Case No. 340 of 1992 whereby the learned...

Rukmini Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1960

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Prasad, J.C. to A.G.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself.2. The sole petitioner Rukmini Devi working as Female Health Worker (Mahila Kaksha Sevika)...

Jai Kumar Mahto and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 323

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR112(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Deo, Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5/8/1991 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Deoghar in Sessions Trial No. 5/88/14/88 whereby all the appellants have been convicted for the offences under Sections...