Advanced Search Results

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., vs Esthapanose,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2025/16TH PHALGUNA, 1946 MACA NO.109 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 06.05.2020 IN OPMV NO.1358 OF...

Esthapanose vs the Managing Director

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2025/16TH PHALGUNA, 1946 MACA NO.109 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 06.05.2020 IN OPMV NO.1358 OF...

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs G.I. George

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2025/16TH PHALGUNA, 1946 MACA NO.109 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 06.05.2020 IN OPMV NO.1358 OF...

Khuzema Mohd. Mamuwala Vs. Shabbir Taherbhai Ranijiwala

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : 1998(1)ALT(Cri)209; 1998CriLJ2680; 1997(3)CTC418

Advocate for Respondent : A.J. Jawad, Adv.

ORDER1. Oral leave for getting a certificate from this Court to file an appeal before the Supreme Court is sought for by Mr. Raghunathan, the learned counsel for the petitioner by raising a question, whether the...

Sukhendu Bikash Addy Vs. BipIn Behari Addy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2) and 8

Reported in : AIR2002Cal60

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shibdas Banerjee

ORDERD.K. Seth, J.1. In 1987, a suit for partition was filed in respect of a property known as Addy Estate. On 7th of February, 1994 the properties in Premises Nos. 56 and 58, Chetla Road, Calcutta...

Basudev Malik Vs. State of W.B. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN32

Advocate for Respondent : Amales Roy and ;D. Mukherjee, Advs. for Respondent No. 6

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. By this writ application the writ petitioner, an approved assistant teacher of a school has challenged Annexure -P/14 to the instant writ application by which he was suspended in terms of the Management...

Amal Roy Choudhary Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

T.N.R. Tirumaupad, J.C.1. This is an application for the issue of a certificate under Article 134(l)(c) of the Constitution.2. The petitioner Amal Roy Choudhary who was an. Inspector of the Procurement Directorate of the Tripura Government...

In Re: Sushanta Goswami and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 22; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379 and 406

Reported in : (1969)1SCC273; [1969]3SCR138

Grover, J.1. This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution by Sushanta Goswami and 46 others for a writ in the nature of hebeas corpus challenging the detention of the petitioners under the provisions...

In Re: Director General of Police and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 9, 16, 19, 22, 34 and 114; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 151; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 141, 143, 340 and 341; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 22(2)

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1955

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Acg, C.J.1. These two suo motu rules alleging criminal contempt of Court were heard together as facts giving rise to issue of those two Rules are mostly interlinked.2. On January 15, 2007. this Bench...

In Re: the Court on Its Own Motion

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 9, 16, 19 and 22; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 141, 143 and 340; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 151; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 22(2); ;Suo Motu Rules - Rule 29

Reported in : (2007)2CALLT370(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Milan Bhattacharyya, ;Goutam Banerjee and ;Daisy Basu, Advs. for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, ;Nisith Nandan Adhikari, Adv. for ;Jiten Das and ;Pabitra Bhattachary

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, A.C.J.1. These two Suo Motu Rules alleging Criminal Contempt of Court were heard together as facts giving rise to issue of those two Rules are mostly interlinked.2. On January 15, 2007, this Bench issued...