Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: altaf ahmed · Page 1 of about 264 results (0.089 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 13 1996

Keshub Mahindra Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-13-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227, 228, 397 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 299, 304, 304A, 321, 322, 324, 326, 336, 337, 338, 425 and 429; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : II(1996)ACC292; 1996VIAD(SC)657; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)662; 1996(3)Crimes288(SC); JT1996(8)SC136; 1996(6)SCALE522; (1996)6SCC129; [1996]Supp6SCR285

Advocate for Respondent : Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General, ; P. Parameswaran and ;

S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted in all these Special Leave Petitions.2. In these appeals the concerned appellant - accused have brought in challenge the order dated 8th April 1993 passed by the Court of 9th Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2007

Reliance Energy Limited and anr. Vs. Maharashtra State Road Developmen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-11-2007

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226

Reported in : IV(2007)BC391(SC); 2007(6)BomCR677; 2007(2)CTLJ140(SC); JT2007(11)SC1; 2007(11)SCALE49; (2007)8SCC1; [2008]85SCL320(SC); 2007AIRSCW6416; 2007(8)SCC1; JT2007(11)SC1.

Advocate for Respondent : Altaf Ahmed, Sr. Adv., ; Prashant Chavan, ; Varun Thakur

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. State of Maharashtra through Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (for short, 'MSRDC') floated Global Tender for completing Mumbai Trans Harbour Link ('MTHL') between Mumbai and Navi Mumbai on BOT basis.2. Reliance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

S.A. JalaluddIn Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 - Sections 4(1), 18, 18(1), 21(1), 27 and 27(2); Land Acquisition (Karnataka Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967 - Sections 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Reported in : AIR2003SC1258; JT2003(5)SC488; 2003(2)SCALE733; (2003)4SCC686; [2003]2SCR410

Advocate for Respondent : Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General, ; S.K. Kulkarni and ;

1. The above appeal has been filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dated 26th September, 1995 in RFA No. 232 of 1984 whereunder a challenge made to the Notification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 24 2000

Om Parkash Sharma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2000

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR2000SC2335; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)957; 2000CriLJ3478; 2000(3)CTC55; JT2000(6)SC554; 2000(4)SCALE264; (2000)5SCC679

ORDERDoraiswamy Raju, J.1. Leave granted.2. The above appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dated 4.1.99 in Criminal Revision No. 123/97, repelling a challenge made to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2004

State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 91, 173, 207, 207(1), 207(4), 207(5), 207(6), 207(7), 207(11), 207(14), 207A, 209, 227, 228, 228(1), 239, 240; Constitution of India - Article 14, 21 and 226; Income Tax Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR2005SC359; 99(2005)CLT348(SC); 2005(1)CTC134; JT2004(10)SC303; 2005(1)KLT80(SC); 2005(I)OLR(SC)357; RLW2005(3)SC414; 2004(10)SCALE50; (2005)1SCC568; MANU/SC/1010/2004

Advocate for Respondent : U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv., ; Uday Gupta, ; Shivani M. Lal and

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. Can the trial court at the time of framing of charge consider material filed by the accused, is the point for determination in these matters.2. In Satish Mehra v. Delhi Administration and Anr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1991

Janata Dal Vs. H.S. Chowdhary and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 51A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397, 401 and 482

Reported in : 1991CriLJ838; 1991(3)Crimes337(SC); JT1991(3)SC497; 1991(2)SCALE400; (1991)3SCC756; [1991]3SCR752

ORDERS. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. A brief resume of the facts which has given rise to the above appeals and Writ Petition would be necessary to appreciate the unsavorous controversies created by way of public interest litigations,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Collector and ors. Vs. P. Mangamma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1950 - Sections 47, 48 and 166B; Special Loani Rules; Prohibition Act, 1977 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 3

Reported in : AIR2003SC1706; 2003(4)ALD86(SC); 2003(4)ALT60(SC); JT2003(2)SC286; 2003(2)SCALE499; (2003)4SCC488; [2003]2SCR430

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These appeals involve common points and are directed against a Division Bench judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Factual matrix giving rise to these appeals is as follows:2. Proceedings were initiated by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2000

State of Delhi Vs. Gyan Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173(2), 227, 228, 239, 240, 397, 401 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 498-A

Reported in : 2001(1)ALT(Cri)66; 2001CriLJ124; 2000(7)SCALE192; (2000)8SCC239; [2000]Supp4SCR270

D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Leave granted.2. The limited question that arises for consideration in this case is whether the High Court committed any illegality/error in quashing the charge framed under Section 304 read with Section 34 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2009

V. Kannan Vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1998 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Reported in : AIR2010SC166; JT2009(11)SC4; 2009(11)SCALE858; (2009)9SCC87:2009AIRSCW5805

Advocate for Respondent : T.V. Ratnam, ; M. Chandra Shekhar and ; B.K. Prasad, Advs

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Madras dated 4.7.2008 delivered in Criminal Appeal No. 664 of 2002.3. The brief facts which are necessary to dispose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2007

Indian Overseas Bank, Anna Salai and anr. Vs. P. Ganesan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1961; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 427 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Constitution of India - Article 136 and 226

Reported in : AIR2008SC553; 2007(5)CTC632; [2008(116)FLR494]; (2008)ILLJ502SC; (2008)1MLJ37(SC); 2007(3)SCALE446:2008(1)LHSC605.

Advocate for Respondent : V. Prakash, Sr. Adv., ; Amit Sharma, ; Anupam Lal Das, ;

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Whether pendency of a criminal case by itself would be a sufficient ground for stay of the departmental proceedings is the principal question which arises for our consideration in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial