Advanced Search Results

Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Rajasthan Employment of Physical Handicapped Rules, 1976 - Rule 4(1)

Reported in : 2002(5)WLC87

Advocate for Respondent : Akhil Simlote

Madam, J.1. With the consent of the parties, the matter has been heard finally at admission stage itself. The case of the petitioner in short is that pursuant to the advertisement issued in Rajasthan Patrika by...

Santosh Gupta (Smt.) Vs. Govind Gupta

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1049

R.M. Lodha, J.1. These two appeals are from the judgment and order dated 2.6.2006 passed by the Family Court No. 2, Jaipur and, therefore, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this...

Arun Singhal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(1)WLC783

Advocate for Respondent : Akhil Simlote, Adv.

Madan, J.1. Though the malter was listed for on respondents' application for vacation of stay order dated 15.10.2001 but with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being decided finally since...

M/S Bahubali Stone Crusher and ors. Vs.Raj State Pollution Control and ...

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

Subject : Environment

Acts : Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act - Sections 21(4), 31A, 21(7)(4)(1)(6)(3), 26, 31, 24, 27, 17 Rule 6, 6(1); Constitution of India - Article 226, 19, 21, 14; Environment Protection Act - 5, 7, 19.

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.S.K. Shukla; Mr.Akhil Simlote,Advs.

(1) With the closure of their stone crushers, with the threat to their right to livelihood, the petitioners, the owners of the stone crushers, have rushed to this Court for protection. Since through these petitions, the...

State Insurance and Provident Fund Dept. Vs. Rameshwar Prasad and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ706Raj; 1994(2)WLC227; 1994(1)WLN406

Advocate for Respondent : Prem Krishna Sharma, Adv. For Respondent No. 1

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the award dated June 17, 1993 passed by the Labour Court, Jaipur in case No. LCR 85/1991-Rameshwar Prasad v. Director. State Insurance and Provident Fund Department. Admitted...

Smt. Pushpa Mishra and ors. Vs. Mact and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 174 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 11

Reported in : 2005ACJ1595; AIR2004Raj211; 2004(3)WLC62

ORDERShiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Claimant-petitioners seek to quash the order dated March 16, 2004 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Additional District Judge No. 8, Jaipur City whereby the execution application filed by petitioners...

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Ram Kishan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff Rules, 1957 - Rules 7, 25(10) and 27

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj726

Advocate for Respondent : Rajveer Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Sharma, J. 1. Since the order dated August 14, 2001 of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal Jaipur is under challenge in this batch of six writ petitions, it was heard analogously and is being disposed...

Pushpa Mishra and ors. Vs. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2006)ACC362

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Claimant-petitioners seek to quash the order dated 16.3.2004 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge No. 8, Jaipur City, whereby the execution application filed by the petitioners under Order 21...

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Shivnandan Lal Sharma

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rule 26A; Rajasthan Educational Service Rules, 1970 - Rule 25(11A)

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2224; 2002(1)WLC98; 2002(4)WLN436

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Sharma, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J.1. By consent of both the parties, the main appeal itself is taken up for admission.2. We have heard Shri Akhil Simlote, counsel for the appellants and Shri, SP. Sharma, counsel for the respondents.3. This...

Ashok Kumar JaIn Vs. Sumati Jain

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj1836

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The appellant is challenging the judgment dated 13.2.98 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jaipur, whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the appellant's application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955...