Advanced Search Results

Kundan Mal Vs. Nand Kishore and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(22) and 35; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62 and 63

Reported in : AIR1994Raj1

Advocate for Respondent : Gopal Raj Singhvi, Adv.

ORDERRajesh Balia, J. 1. These two revision petitions arise in the identical facts and circumstances giving rise to common issue. Hence they are decided by a common Order.2. One Kundanmal, who is petitioner in both the...

Yakub Ismailbhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 304; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 344; Evidence Act, 1857 - Sections 114 and 134

Reported in : AIR2004SC4209; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)881; 2004CriLJ4205; (2005)1GLR312; JT2004(7)SC178; 2004(7)SCALE374b; (2004)12SCC229; 2004(2)LC1378(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Madhukar, ; Sadhana Sandhu and ; Hemantika Wahi, Advs.

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The present criminal appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 29.08.2003 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No. 327 of 1998 wherein the High Court...

Mohd. YasIn Shah Vs. Ali Akbar Khan Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 47

Reported in : AIR1976SC1866; (1977)2SCC23; [1976]SuppSCR1

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. This is an election appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dated June 10, 1974, by which the learned Judge allowed the election petition filed before...

Sangavva Gulappa Khandekar Vs. Gulappa Kariyeppa Khandekar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1942Bom258; (1942)44BOMLR614

Broomfield, J.1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Bijapur in certain maintenance proceedings.2. On January 15, 1940, the opponent Gulappa was directed to pay maintenance to his wife Sangawa at the rate of...

Jaikumar Shivlal Shah and ors. Vs. Motilal Hirachand Gandhi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4 and 13; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(5), 2(22) and 36; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Sections 35 and 58

Reported in : AIR1973Bom27; (1972)74BOMLR174; ILR1972Bom816; 1972MhLJ405

Advocate for Respondent : S.J. Deshpande, Adv.

1. This is an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Osmanabad, in Civil Appeal No.34 of 1968 arising out of the decree passed by the Subordinate Judge Osmanabad, in Civil Suit...

Lala Karam Chand Vs. Mian Mir Ahmad Aziz Ahmad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1938)40BOMLR1053

George Lowndes, J.1. The suit out of which this appeal arises was instituted by the appellants in the Court of the Senior Subordinate Judge of Peshawar, claiming payment by the respondent, sued both as a firm...

Suleman Haji Ahmed Umer Vs. Haji Abdulla Haji Rahimtulla

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1940)42BOMLR971

Philip Macdonell, J.1. This is an appeal from a decision of the High Court of Bombay in its appellate jurisdiction, given in favour of the plaintiff-respondent, and reversing a judgment of the Original Side of that...

Laxmichand Tuljaram Shedji Vs. the Pioneer Urban Co-operative Bank

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1944Bom265; (1944)46BOMLR522

Divatia, J.1. This appeal was remanded to the trial Court for a finding on the issue as to whether the plaintiff had knowledge of the attachment at the date of the mortgage to him. The plaintiff...

Malak Khan Vs. the King-emperor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1946)48BOMLR132

Porter, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Judicature alt Lahore dated October 18, 1944, dismissing the appellant's appeal from the judgment of the Sessions Judge of Jhelum dated July...

Sayed Ahmed Kabuli Vs. the State of Maharasthra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 9(2); Citizenship Rules - Rule 30; Constitution of India - Articles 5 to 11; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 28 - Schedule - Article 120

Reported in : AIR1975Bom176; (1974)76BOMLR258

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Pratap, Asst. Govt. Pleader

Deshpande, J. 1. The plaintiff, appellant in this letters Patent Appeal, Instituted a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay for - (a) declaration that the plaintiff was a citizen of India. and (b) for...