Advanced Search Results

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. SaifuddIn and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act; Telephone Rules - Rule 440; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 9; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ98

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Chaudhary, Adv. for Defendant No. 2

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The plaintiff, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd (hereafter called. 'MTNL') sues the defendants for a decree in the sum of Rs. 17,83,056/- with interest at 24% p.a.2. According, to averments in the plaint,...

Om Pati Vs. Raj Bir

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR2004P& H171; (2003)134PLR754

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Chaudhary, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J. 1. The present appeal has been filed by Shrimati Om Pati-appellant challenging the judgment dated December 23, 2000 passed by the leaned Additional District Judge, Hisar whereby the marriage between the parties, namely,...

Ajay Chaudhary Vs. Santosh Kumar and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1) and 17(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Hindu Law

Reported in : (2003)135PLR3

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Khetrapl, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; Suba Singh, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

M.L. Singhal, J.1. Plaintiff Smt. Santosh Kumari is the wife of Sh. Ch. Dube Singh of village Kurar. Defendant No. 1 is Ch. Sube Singh himself while defendant No. 2 Ajay Chaudhary and defendant No. 3...

Mr. Ajay Chaudhary Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - sections 154,164,173(4),437,438,439,207; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74, 76, 123, 162

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.S. Chandhiok; Mr.Pawan Sharma,Advs

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YesDIPAK MISRA, CJ1.The fundamental...

Court on Its Own Motion Through Mr. Ajay Chaudhary . Vs. State .

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.S. Chandhiok; Mr.Pawan Sharma, Advs.

1.The fundamental issue that has emerged for consideration in this writ petition that has been instituted on the basis of a letter sent to this Court is whether an accused is entitled to a copy of...

Bajaj Allianz General Insureance Co Ltd vs.devki Nadan Kumar & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.K. Pandey, Mr. P.S. Jha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + MAC.APP. 821/2017 and C.M. Appl. Nos.33274-75/2017 Date of Decision:21. t February, 2018 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSUREANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate...

Smt. Bimla Devi and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Lao

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. A. 480/1998 Date of Decision:7. h July, 2014 + # SMT. BIMLA Devi & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K.B.Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr....

Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Criminal

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7770/2012 Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :15. h December, 2012 HON'BLE SHRI SANDEEP...

Rajesh Gupta Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 239/2010 & Crl.M.B.119/2013 Date of Decision:11. h September, 2013 RAJESH GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.B .Dandapani, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI...

Rajiv Gaur & Anr vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:27. 2.2018 + W.P.(C) 1851/2018 & CM No.7722/2018 (stay) RAJIV GAUR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Syed Asif Iqbal and Mr. Parmesh...