Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: addl g a · Page 1 of about 210 results (0.178 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 16 2005

Khundrakpam Nimai Singh Alias Yaikhomba Alias Rameshwar Alias M.C. Ind ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-16-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 8, 8(1) and 12(1); Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(5) and 226

Advocate for Respondent : Th. Ibohal, Addl. G.A. and N. Ibotombi, CGSC

M. BK. Singh, J.1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for enforcing the petitioner's fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 and 22 of the Constitution and praying for releasing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2004

Kush Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Sep-01-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 364, 394 and 406

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1639

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rab, Addl. G.A.

J.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This is a criminal appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Code') against the judgment and order dated 8-9-1995 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar convicting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2005

Sadashivu Balappa Samagar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-27-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2006CriLJ899

Advocate for Respondent : N. Rudramani, Addl. G.A.

A.C. Kabbin, J.1. By judgment dated 26-2-2003, the Sessions Judge, Bamako convicted the accused in S.C. No. 74/2002 for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo R. I. for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 26 2000

Kumari Angom Sarjubala Devi Vs. Manipur Public Service Commission and ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-26-2000

Subject : Service

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A. Jagatchandra Singh, Mr. Kh. Nimaichand Singh and Mr. L. Sharat Sharma, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. Ch. Joychandra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Heard also Mr. A. Jagatchandra Singh, learned Addl. G.A. as well as Mr. Kh. Nimaichand Singh, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for respondents in WP (C)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2009

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-05-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 64, 64(4), 68 and 69; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(1), 9, 9(1), 10, 10 (1), 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 11(2); Land Acquisition Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(1), 7(2), 13 and 18; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 12 (1), 12(3), 21 to 24 , 31, 33 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 123, 124 and 127A(2); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. 1956 - Sections 136; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

Advocate for Respondent : Bharati Dangre, Additional Government Pleader, ;T.R. Kankale, Asst. Govt. Pleaders, ;D.B. Patel and ;R.N. Kothari, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Common question involved in all these Writ Petitions is, .whether State Government can levy and demand any sum as amount of nonagricultural assessment from Petitioners WCL.... Petitioner- Company is incorporated under the Companies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2008

Ashok Alias Papu Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jun-27-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ554

J.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 21.02.2003, passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge/1st F.T.C./Special Judge C.B.I., Dehradun in S.T. No. 74 of 2002 whereby the appellant has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2013

Suresh Ram Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : May-21-2013

Subject : Criminal

B.S. Verma, J. This appeal, under Section 374 Cr.P.C., is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.2.2008, passed by Sessions Judge, Bageshwar in Sessions Trial No. 18/2007, State Vs. Suresh Ram, convicting the accused U/S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2006

Smt. Sagolsem Ningol Puyam Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-26-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 8, 10, 14 and 14(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; National Security (Amendment) Act, 1984; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22 and 22(5)

Advocate for Respondent : Th. Ibohal Addl. GA and K. Kumar Singh Addl. CGSC

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Mr. N. Brojen Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Th. Ibohal, learned Addl. G. A. appearing on behalf of the respondents-1, 2 and 3 and Mr. K. Kumar, learned Addl. CGSC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2008

Karuna Nidhan Chakma Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-12-2008

Subject : Service

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T.D. Mazumdar

U.B. Saha, J.1. The petitioner, a constable in 2nd Tripura Armed Forces Bn., for short TAP Bn., files the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution assailing the Memorandum dated 06.05.97, whereby and whereunder...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2007

Nameirakpam Inaotomba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : Criminal

U.B. Saha, J.1. Heard Mr. M.I. Sharma, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Th. Ibohal, learned Addl. G.A. for the State respondents-2 to 3 and Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned CGC appearing for the respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial