Advanced Search Results

Kanoria Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57B and 57C to 57V; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 112; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2005(190)ELT295(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : B. Papegowda and ;N.R. Bhaskar, ACGSCs, ; M.V. Chandrashekar Reddy and ;P.S. Dinesh Kumar, CGSCs

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. These two writ petitions are by assessees under the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 [for short, the Act] in the context of denial of what is known as Modvat credit...

Smt. L.V. Sankeshwar, Proprietrix, Vijayanand Travels and ors. Etc. Et ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Karnataka Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 49; Motor Vehicles Act 1988 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(40) and 2(43); Finance Act 1994 - Sections 65, 65(38), 65(48), 65(62), 65(72) and 65(78); Expenditure Tax Act 1987; Service Tax Act, 1994; Finance Act 1997; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 248, 248(2) and 366(29A)

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(Kar)274; 2006(112)ECC188; 2006LC188(Karnataka); 2006[4]STR257; [2007]6STT31

Advocate for Respondent : Aravind Kumar, ACGSC

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. The issue involved in all these writ petitions is levy of 'Service Tax' on tour operators, whose services are brought under the 'Service Tax' net by the Finance Act 1997 (by amending Finance...

C.P.Balan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 8272 OF 2006 PETITIONERS: 1 C.P.BALAN *(DIED) CPB HOUSE,...

K.K. Remani, Additional Secretary to Government Home Department, Gover ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Original Applications No. 118/10 and No. 184/10 were heard together as the main and common prayer of the applicants therein is for their inclusion in the select list for filling up two vacancies for appointment...

N. Kumar Vs. M.O. Roy, Assistant Director, Serious Fraud Investigation ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 207, 621 and 621(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227, 239, 245, 468(2), 469(1), 470, 470(3) and 473

Reported in : 2007(3)CTC650; [2007]80SCL55(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : M. Dhamodharan, ACGSC

ORDERK.N. Basha, J.1. The petitioner, who has been arrayed as A-2 out of 13 accused in E.O.C.C. No. 129 of 2006 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.II, Egmore, Chennai, has come...

M.K. Balachandran Pillai Vs. the Principal Registrar, Central Administ ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Education

K. George Joseph, Administrative Member 1. While serving as Section Officer, Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ernakulam Bench, the applicant was promoted on ad hoc basis as Deputy Registrar, CAT, Ahmedabad Bench on 05.03.2009. His pay was...

S. Gurubalasubramaniyan Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secreta ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Education

HON'BLE MR. K GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER 1. The applicant in this O.A. is a Technician (Electronics) under the Regional Director, Department of Lighthouses and Lightships, Kadavanthara. He was appointed as such on 23.09.2002 in the...

Umaballav Mohapatra, Advocate, Vs. Central Administrative

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. M.L. Verma

Dhannalal v. Kalawatibai and Ors. held as follows: that procedural law cannot betray the substantive law by submitting to subordination of complexity. Courts are equipped with power to interpret law are often posed with queries which...

Shiny James and Another Vs. Union of India Represented by the Joint Se ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Education

K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER1. The applicants in this O.A. are presently working as Upper Division Clerks (UDC) under the 2nd respondent. They have joined services with effect from 06.10.1994 as Lower Division Clerks (LDC). As...

M. Vijayan Superintendent of Central Excise Kannur Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Education

Dr. K.B.S. Rajan, Member (J) 1. This OA was initially decided vide order dated 25-07-2012, wherein the following order was passed:- "The applicant in this O.A. is aggrieved by the denial of 3rd financial upgradation under...