Advanced Search Results
Shaibya Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Mar-13-1992
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 37, 47, 48 and 51-A
AIR1993All171
Mr. Mohd. Abid Ali and ;Mr. T.R. Singh, Advs.
ORDERH.N. Tilhari, J. 1. This petition has been filed by petitioner Smt. Shaibya Shukla alleging to be in public interest keeping in view the provisions of Art. 51A of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sagar Mal Shambhoo Nath
Allahabad
Dec-16-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31), 4(A), 5, 5(2), 70, 143, 144, 159(3), 159(6), 170, 182, 183, 184, 184(7), 184(8), 187, 187(1), 187(2), 188, 189 and 256(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 3, 4, 23, 26, 30, 31 to 38, 39 to 55; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984; Predecessor Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23, 23(5), 25(1), 25(4), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 28 and 44; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Income Tax Law
(2006)203CTR(All)167; [2008]296ITR440(All)
V.B. Upadhyay, ;Ashish Agarwal, ;Kshitij Shailendra, ;V.K. Gupta and ;M.K. Gupta, Advs.
Dilip Gupta, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the '1961 Act') for opinion to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamiyappan Vs. S. Sarmila Banu
Chennai
Oct-03-2016
Land Acquisition
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order of acquitting the Respondent / Accused passed in S.T.C.No.1633 of 2008 dated 16.07.2009 on the file of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shyam Singh Hada and ors. Vs. State
Rajasthan
Nov-22-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 376(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32
2002CriLJ1437; RLW2003(3)Raj1918; 2002(1)WLC382
S. Purohit, Public Prosecutor
Madam, J. 1. These two criminal appeals have been preferred by Shyam Singh Hada (No. 668/99) and Hariom @ Pappu (No. 749/99) against a judgment dated 11.10.99 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Bundi in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGummidelli Anantapadmanabhaswami Vs. the Official Receiver of Secunder ...
Mumbai
Feb-02-1933
Property
(1933)35BOMLR747
Thankerton, J.1. This is an appeal from a decree of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated October 2, 1930, which set aside a judgment and order dated April 23, 1929, made by the same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ram Jas Rai Askaran Das
Allahabad
Nov-23-1995
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184(7) and 187(2)
(1996)134CTR(All)407; [1996]218ITR18(All); [1996]85TAXMAN133(All)
1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Revenue, referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this court ;' Whether, on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prakash Textiles Agents
Allahabad
Oct-01-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 187, 187(2), 188 and 256(1); High Court Rules - Rule 12
[2005]276ITR582(All)
None
1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred the following two questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for the opinion of this court :'1. Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gupta Oil and Flour Mills
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-18-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961; Income Tax Rules, 1962
[1994]210ITR709(MP)
None
U.L. Bhat, C.J.1. This is a reference made at the instance of the Revenue by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The following questions have been referred :'(i) Whether, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gobind Ram Vishan Dass
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-16-1989
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184
(1989)79CTR(P& H)233; [1989]178ITR682(P& H)
D.K. Gupta, Adv.
Gokal Chand Mital, J.1. Gobind Ram Vishan Dass, the assessee, was a partnership firm and was granted registration for the year prior to the assessment year 1977-78, the accounting year being from Dussehra to Dussehra. For...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRohini Prasad and ors. Vs. Kasturchand and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-03-2000
Property
Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 44, 168, 169, 185, 189, 190, 250 and 257; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 26 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65
AIR2000SC1283; JT2000(2)SC573; 2000(4)MPHT5; RLW2000(1)SC121; 2000(2)SCALE189; (2000)3SCC668; [2000]2SCR88
Rajesh and ; Raj Kumar Gupta, Advs.
D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Appellant, Rohini Prasad, is aggrieved by the judgment dated October 19, 1987 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur delivered in Second Appeal. High Court had set aside the findings of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »