Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: abid ali · Page 1 of about 196 results (0.284 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 1992

Shaibya Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-13-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 37, 47, 48 and 51-A

Reported in : AIR1993All171

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mohd. Abid Ali and ;Mr. T.R. Singh, Advs.

ORDERH.N. Tilhari, J. 1. This petition has been filed by petitioner Smt. Shaibya Shukla alleging to be in public interest keeping in view the provisions of Art. 51A of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2005

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sagar Mal Shambhoo Nath

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31), 4(A), 5, 5(2), 70, 143, 144, 159(3), 159(6), 170, 182, 183, 184, 184(7), 184(8), 187, 187(1), 187(2), 188, 189 and 256(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 3, 4, 23, 26, 30, 31 to 38, 39 to 55; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984; Predecessor Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23, 23(5), 25(1), 25(4), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 28 and 44; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Income Tax Law

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(All)167; [2008]296ITR440(All)

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Upadhyay, ;Ashish Agarwal, ;Kshitij Shailendra, ;V.K. Gupta and ;M.K. Gupta, Advs.

Dilip Gupta, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the '1961 Act') for opinion to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2016

Samiyappan Vs. S. Sarmila Banu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-03-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order of acquitting the Respondent / Accused passed in S.T.C.No.1633 of 2008 dated 16.07.2009 on the file of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 22 2001

Shyam Singh Hada and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-22-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 376(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1437; RLW2003(3)Raj1918; 2002(1)WLC382

Advocate for Respondent : S. Purohit, Public Prosecutor

Madam, J. 1. These two criminal appeals have been preferred by Shyam Singh Hada (No. 668/99) and Hariom @ Pappu (No. 749/99) against a judgment dated 11.10.99 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Bundi in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 1933

Gummidelli Anantapadmanabhaswami Vs. the Official Receiver of Secunder ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-02-1933

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1933)35BOMLR747

Thankerton, J.1. This is an appeal from a decree of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated October 2, 1930, which set aside a judgment and order dated April 23, 1929, made by the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1995

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ram Jas Rai Askaran Das

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184(7) and 187(2)

Reported in : (1996)134CTR(All)407; [1996]218ITR18(All); [1996]85TAXMAN133(All)

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Revenue, referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this court ;' Whether, on the facts and in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2004

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prakash Textiles Agents

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 187, 187(2), 188 and 256(1); High Court Rules - Rule 12

Reported in : [2005]276ITR582(All)

Advocate for Respondent : None

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred the following two questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for the opinion of this court :'1. Whether,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1994

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gupta Oil and Flour Mills

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961; Income Tax Rules, 1962

Reported in : [1994]210ITR709(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : None

U.L. Bhat, C.J.1. This is a reference made at the instance of the Revenue by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The following questions have been referred :'(i) Whether, on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1989

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gobind Ram Vishan Dass

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-16-1989

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184

Reported in : (1989)79CTR(P& H)233; [1989]178ITR682(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Gupta, Adv.

Gokal Chand Mital, J.1. Gobind Ram Vishan Dass, the assessee, was a partnership firm and was granted registration for the year prior to the assessment year 1977-78, the accounting year being from Dussehra to Dussehra. For...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2000

Rohini Prasad and ors. Vs. Kasturchand and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 44, 168, 169, 185, 189, 190, 250 and 257; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 26 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65

Reported in : AIR2000SC1283; JT2000(2)SC573; 2000(4)MPHT5; RLW2000(1)SC121; 2000(2)SCALE189; (2000)3SCC668; [2000]2SCR88

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh and ; Raj Kumar Gupta, Advs.

D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Appellant, Rohini Prasad, is aggrieved by the judgment dated October 19, 1987 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur delivered in Second Appeal. High Court had set aside the findings of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial