Advanced Search Results
Tata Finance Ltd. Vs. Kanoria Sugar and General Manufacturing Company ...
Mumbai
Oct-11-2001
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 396, 397, 398, 434, 443, 443(1) and (2)
2002(3)BomCR173; (2002)1BOMLR187; [2002]112CompCas507(Bom); 2002(1)MhLj617
Dwarkadas and ;R.D. Dhanukha, Advs. and ;R.D. Yadav, Adv., i/b., ;A.R. Dhanuka, Adv.
A.P. Shah, J.1. The appellants before us are the original petitioners in Company Petition No. 203 of 2001 and in the appeal, they impugn the order of the learned Company Judge, dismissing the petition. In order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited Vs. Shri R.K. Dhall and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-11-2009
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 397 and 398; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 - Rule 44
[2010]153CompCas152(Bom); [2009]95SCL86(Bom)
A.Y. Bookwalla, Sr. Counsel, ;J.S. Bakshi, ;C.D. Mehta, ;Darshan Mehta and ;Faiza Dhanani, Advs., i/b., Dhruv Liladhar and Co. for Respondent No. 1 and ;Raju Subramanian, Sr. Counsel, ;Rahul Chitnis,
S.J. Kathawalla, J.1 Heard Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel appearing for the respective contesting respondents waive service. As a short question is involved, the appeal is admitted and finally disposed of. 2. By this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Chawla Interbild Construction Company Private ...
Mumbai
Dec-04-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34
2003(2)ALLMR596; 2003(3)ARBLR461(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj889
A.Y. Bookwalla, ;G.R. Joshi and ;M.S. Rane, Advs., i/b., ;Ashwin Ankhad, Adv.
ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioners, by the present Petition, impugn the Award dated 26th December 1998. It is not necessary to go into all the controversies considering the challenges to the award. Though the arbitral clause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›