Advanced Search Results

M/S Saipavani-Kbnr Jv, vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO. 103146 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. SAIPAVANI-KBNR JV, PLOT NO.391, FLAT...

Safdar HussaIn and ors. Vs. S.K. Abdul Rahim

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B and 420

Reported in : AIR1967Mad4; 1967CriLJ84

ORDER(1) These are related criminal revision proceedings involving the same question of law. In all of them, the concerned revision petitioners were respective accused in prosecutions under S. 78(c) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act...

The Southern India Education Trust, Madras Vs. M.S. Jagadambal Overruled

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 142; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 30 and 31 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65; Specific Relief Act - Sections 8 and 9; General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1972Mad162

Ramanujam, J.1. This appeal by the fifth defendant is directed against the decision of Kailasam, J., in C. S. No. 52 of 1960, upholding the plaintiff's title to the suit lands and directing delivery of possession...

Tramboo Joinery Mill Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. and ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Chashoo

1. This order is in continuation of an earlier order passed in AA no. 7/2013. A copy of that order be added as part of this order. The petitioner had earlier filed AA no. 7/2013 which...

A. S. Muthiah and ors. Vs. Peter Nadar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1974)2MLJ404

P. R. Gokulakrishnan, J.1. The legal representatives of the first plaintiff and plaintiffs 2 to 4 are the appellants. The suit was for a declaration of title and recovery of possession of the plaint schedule properties.2....

Arunachala Naicker and ors. Vs. Janakirama Naicker

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1999)2MLJ648

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.Rajendran

K. Sampath, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 211 of 1982 on the file of the District Munsif, Polur, are the appellants in the second appeal. The respondent filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction...

K.K. Suresh Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 33

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR663; 1998(3)BomCR717

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Joshi, Addl. Govt. Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This revision application challenges the order dated 20th June 1997 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem in Special Civil Suit No. 84/94/A. By the impugned order the trial Court has appointed...

Lakshmi Vs. Khader Basha

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ199

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Hemalatha, Adv.

ORDER1. The plaintiff is the petitioner. The plaintiff filed O.S.No.2393 of 1993 against the respondent herein and one Nazeer, who is now deceased, for vacant possession of the suit property. The petitioner's husband, one Sreenivasagam filed...

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Pandit Radhika Prasad ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : AIR1923Mad667; (1923)44MLJ685

Walter Salis Schwabe, K.C., C.J.1. The history of this matter is so clearly stated in the judgment of Coutts Trotter, J., that it is unnecessary for me to repeat it and I have nothing to add...

Ettiappa Mudaliar and anr. Vs. T. Subramanian

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 17 and 25; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6

Reported in : I(1994)DMC166; (1993)IMLJ333

Advocate for Respondent : S. Balasubramaniam, ;A.V. Munuswamy, ;S.M.M. Hussain and ;D. Umakanth, Advs.

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.The respondents before the lower Court are the appellants herein. The present appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 9.1.1992 in G.W.O.P. No. 156 of 1990 on the file of the...