Advanced Search Results

Cosmos Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. General Federation Maharashtra State ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : The Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Bombay Industrial Disputes Act, 1938; The Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3 and 56; General Clauses Act; Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 142 and 226

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR877

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Bukhari, Sr. Counsel, ;Burhan V. Bukhari and ;A.S. Peerzada, Advs.

Khanwilkar A.M., J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties.2. Rule. Mr. B.V. Bukhari waives notice for respondents.3. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent and matter is heard for final disposal.4. This petition takes exception to the judgment...

Narayan R. Bhosekar Vs. Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(6)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1034; 2002(3)BomCR340; [2002(94)FLR55]; 2002(1)MhLj576

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Bukhari and ;Rita N. Vora, Advs., i/b., Crawford Bayley & Co.

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, Narayan Bhosekar, being aggrieved by the order of dismissal, dated 9-11-1993, passed by the first respondent, praying that it be declared that the impugned order, dismissing him...

Bses Limited Vs. Bombay Electric Workers Union and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ462Bom

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Bukhari, ;Kishore Shetty, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.S. Naphade, ;Avinash Jalisatgi, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6

1. Heard Mr. J.P. Cama, the learned senior counsel for the appellant. Mr. A.V. Bukhari, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr. S.S. Naphade, the learned senior counsel for the respondents 3...

Walchandnagar Industries Limited (Engineering and Foundary Division) V ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 25A, 25F, 25G, 25K and 25N; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions And Prevention of Unfair Labour Pracitccs Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 7, 20(2) and 32; Payment of Gratuity Act; Contract Act - Sections 23; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rules 58(2), 62, 80 and 81; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Law

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR733; (2005)107BOMLR942; (2006)IILLJ834Bom

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Dharap, Adv.

S.B. Mhase, J.1. Both these Letter Patent Appeals are directed against the judgment and orders passed by the learned Single Judge of this court on 19th April 2002 in Writ Petitions Nos. 4730 of 1994 and...

.Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai and anr. Vs. Municipal Mazdoor Uni ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Section 28 (1) read with Items 5 & 9 of Schedule IV; Trade Unions Act, 1926; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2(b); Punjab Municipal Act, 1911

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.S.U.Kamdar; Ms.Neeta Karnik; Mr.M.D.Nagle, Advs.

1. Heard Mr.A.V.Bukhari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.S.U.Kamdar, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents at length. Rule. Mr.M.D.Nagle waives service on behalf of the Respondents. By consent of the parties and in view of...

Digamber Shankar Bhalerao Vs. Maharashtra State Co-op. Housing Finance ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 12

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR277

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.D. Patil, Adv.

A.Y. Sakhare, J. 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the decision to revert him from the post of Deputy Manager to the post of Class...

M/S.Mumbai Cricket Association Vs. Pramod G. Shinde

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 33

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.S.S.Pathak; Mr.T.R.Yadav, Advs.

1 Rule. Respondent waives service. By consent Rule is made returnable forthwith.2 A short but interesting question of law arises for determination in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India which is...

Hindustan Coca Cola Bottling S/W Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Narayan Rawal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 24, 25, 28, 30, 44, 59 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 38, 39, 42, 43, 43-A, 142 and 226; Contract Labour (R & A) Act, 1970 - Sections 10; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR302; 2001(4)BomCR402; (2001)3BOMLR817; [2001(90)FLR150]; (2001)IILLJ502Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.J. Deshmukh, ;Mr. S.Z. Choudhari and ;Mr. N.M. Ganguli, Advs.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The following two latest judgments of the Supreme Court have given rise to the present litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before this Court.(i) Vividh Kamgar Sabha v. Kalyani Steels...

Shri Tulsiram K. Gothad Vs. the Superintendent, Mahatma Gandhi Memoria ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 - Sections 28; Bombay Civil Services Rules (M.C.S.R.); Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23 and 29

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR160; (2001)3BOMLR654; [2001(91)FLR1246]; 2001(3)MhLj662

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.V. Bukhari, Adv., i/b., ;Gopal Daptari

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The problem of age of retirement in the industrial law is of perennial nature. At the fag end of retirement or after a stipulated age of retirement, the employees often contest the age...

Smt. Malik Khairunissa Vs. Anjuman Riaz-ul-islam High School and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2(13) and 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 30, 30(1) and 226

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR489; (2001)3BOMLR175

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.V. Bukhari, Adv. and ;Mr. R.J. Mane, A.G.P.

ORDERR. J. Kochar, J. 1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.10.1997 passed by the School Tribunal at Mumbai in Appeal No. Bom. 48/1993 filed by the Petitioner complaining against the Respondent...