Advanced Search Results

Ms Jai Renga Mills Private Ltd. Vs. the Authorized Officer.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.V.Arun, Adv.

PrayerPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Order/Action of the 1st respondent dated 21.04.2010 and quash the same and...

Madras Security Printers Rep. by Its Partner, P. Sam Prasad and Roseme ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 - Sections 8 and 18(2); Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000 - Rules 17, 18 and 18(5)

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC24; (2008)220CTR(Mad)350; (2008)4MLJ601

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Raman, Additional Adv. General assisted by ;V. Arun, Additional Government Pleader

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. These two Writ Petitions have been filed, one by M/s. Madras Security Printers and the other by M/s. Rosemerta Technologies Pvt. Ltd., praying for a mandamus, directing the respondents to accept the petitioners'...

U. Angamuthu Vs. the Commissioner, Trichengode Municipality,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 182, 182(2), 183, 183(6), 313, 339 and 340; ;Land Encroachment Act; Land Encroachment Act, 1905; Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1975; ;Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Rules

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ517

Advocate for Respondent : V. Subbarayan, Adv. for R. 1, ;V. Arun, Govt. Adv. for R.2 and R.3 and ;K.M. Vijayan, S.C. for ;N. Manokaran, Adv. in for R.4 in Wps. 39377 to 39379, 39530 to 39533, 39578 to 39580 and 39629 to 39632/

ORDERM. Thanikachalam, J. 1. With the consent of either counsel, the main writ petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal.2. All the petitioners herein are occupying different extents of land, by raising pucca buildings in...

K. Kandasamy Vs. Deputy Inspector-general of Police, Tiruchirappalli R ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 - Rules 2 and 6(1); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 27(2)

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1382

Advocate for Respondent : V. Arun, Government Adv.

ORDERV. Ramasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner was issued with a charge memo dated 7.11.1994, primarily accusing him of insubordination and abusing his superior Officer and acting in a manner unbecoming of a Government Servant. The petitioner submitted...

Laxmi and ors. Vs. Savanta Bapu Mali

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, Order 39, Rule 1; Tenancy Act

Reported in : AIR1986Bom169; 1988(4)BomCR278; (1985)87BOMLR159

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Page, Adv.

ORDER1. The respondent in this petition filed a suit, being Regular Civil Suit No. 1 of 1982, in the Court of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Tasgaon, praying, among other things, for a perpetual injunction...

Marybai Marshal Pimenta and anr. Vs. Ramnath Gopal Bhuskute and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 85A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR1988Bom108; (1987)89BOMLR338; 1987MhLJ628

Advocate for Respondent : G.B. Karandikar, Adv.

Sawant, J.1. This is a reference made by a learned single Judge. The short question that arises in the case is: Has the Civil Court jurisdiction to protect the possession of a party to the suit...

The Director, National Institute of Technology and ors. Vs. N.S. Harsh ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Councile for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4215

Advocate for Respondent : G.K.V. Murty, Adv. for R1, ;N.B. Bhat, Adv. for R2, ;K.P. Ashok Kumar, GA for R3 and R4, ;M.V. Hiremath, Adv. for R1, R2, R4-R9, R11, R17, ;G.K.V. Murthy, Adv. for R1 in W.A. Nos. 836-839/2002 and R1

S.R. Nayak, J.1. All India Council for Technical Education, hereinafter shortly referred to as 'AICTE', in pursuance of a direction issued by a learned Single of this Court in ARUN AND ORS. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA...

Kanishka Aggarwal Vs. University of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi University Act, 1922 - Sections 30 and 31; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 226

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi105; ILR1991Delhi491

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariaputhan, Adv.

ORDERJaspal Singh, J.1. T. Shaffer in his On being a Christian and a Lawyer (198 1) paints a devastating picture of the instruction, regulation, and practice of law in the law schools. Had he known that...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kerala Electric Lamp Works Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)157CTR(Ker)346

Arijit Pasayat, C. J. :In the present reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), an interesting question arises for consideration. Question, as referred to by Tribunal, Cochin Bench, reads...

Jai Prakash Associates Limited Thru Rahul Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Substantial questions of law involved in the present writ petition are:A. Whether Government may withdraw the rebate granted in pursuance to notification issued under Section 5 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act...