Advanced Search Results

Pakkirisamy Yadav Saw Mill. Vs. the Additional Principal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamilnadu Regulation of wood based Industries Rules 2010 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.M.K.Subramanian, Adv

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent in E.Mi.PO/E.Pa/Kuda/Ko.Thani/A.No.25/11-12 dated 17.4.2012 and quash the same...

K.Gunasekaran. Vs. the Additional Principal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamilnadu Regulation of wood based Industries Rules 2010 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.M.K.Subramanian, Adv

Writ Petition  is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue  a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent in Letter No.2 Po/E.Pa/Pettai/Ko.Thani.A.No.007/12 dated 18.4.2012 and quash...

Elumalaiyan Saw Mill. Vs. the Additional Principal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamilnadu Regulation of wood based Industries Rules 2010 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.M.K.Subramanian, Adv

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent in E.Mi.PO/E.Pa/Peralam/Kattu.Thani.A.No.11/2012-13 dated 16.4.2012 and quash the same...

S.P. Sabapathi Pillai Vs. M. Durga

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2) and 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1995Mad13

Advocate for Respondent : G. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel

ORDER1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in R.C.A. 332/92 on the file of Appellate Authority (IV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras), in which the learned Appellate Authority had allowed the...

M/S. Tribol Engineering Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11, 12, 20(4) 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 8, Rule 6A

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC385

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G. Subramanian, Senior Counsel for R1, Adv.

ORDERJudgement pronounced by Shivappa, J. 1. The C.M.P.No. 10631 of 1998 has been filed for removal of respondent No.2 Arbitrator on the ground of reasonable apprehension of bias and to appoint an independent Arbitrator in his...

Palanichamy Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endow ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records of the impugned notice, dated 29.08.2016 in Na.Ka.No.1795/2014-1/A3, issued by the 2nd...

John Thomas Vs. Dr. K. Jagadeesan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 199(1), 251, 257 and 258

Reported in : AIR2001SC2651; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)202; [2001]106CompCas619(SC); (2001)4CompLJ28(SC); 2001CriLJ3322; 2001(3)Crimes270(SC); JT2001(5)SC398; 2001(4)SCALE323; (2001)6SCC30; [2001]3

Thomas, J. 1. Leave granted.2. A renowned hospital in the Metropolis of Madras (Chennai) has been caricatured in a newspaper as the abattoir of human kidneys for trafficking purposes. When the Director of the Hospital complained...

Shree Consultations and Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. K.N. Sankaranarayanan a ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 98, 291, 397, 397(1), 398(1), 399, 399(2) and (3) and 402

Reported in : [1995]84CompCas473(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Viduthalai, Adv. and ;T. Raghavan and ;Vedantham Srinivasan for ;Suresh Krishnamurthy, Advs.

Raju, J. 1. The above appeal has been filed against the judgment of a learned single judge of this court dated January 28, 1994, in A.A.O. No. 483 of 1993 (since reported in [1994] 80 Comp...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Seshasayee Bros. (P) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 5 and 28

Reported in : [1999]239ITR471(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Meenakshisundaram, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law for the opinion of this Court : '1. Whether, on the facts...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 30, 37(2), 2(A), 40, 40A and A(5)

Reported in : [1999]235ITR491(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K.M.L. Majele, Adv.

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. The assessee is a domestic company and it is classified as a trading company for the purposes of taxation. The ITO, in the course of assessment proceedings for the asst. yr. 1976-77...