Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a sinha · Page 1 of about 30,360 results (0.625 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 16 1992

Sakharam Trymbak Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-16-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1)

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR134

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Sinha, A.G.P.

B.V. Chavan, J.1. The appellant/original accused, has challenged his conviction and sentence for offences under section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 5(1)(d) read with section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2003

S.C. Saxena and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT355

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Sinha, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The petitioners by this writ petition preferred under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India, have called in question the legal propriety of theorder dated 25-6-1999 passed in O.A. No. 75/91 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1987

Jagdishlal Dhody Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-12-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 39A, 225, 227 and 227(1); High Court Rules - Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1988MP4; 1987MPLJ317

Advocate for Respondent : J.S.L. Sinha, Govt. Adv., ;S.K. Dubey, Adv. President of Bar, ;J.P. Gupta, ;N.K. Jain and ;Arun Mishra, Advs. Members of Bar

ORDERT.N. Singh, J.1. Save by constitutional amendment, powers of a single Judge of a High Court to act suo motu under Article 227, in appending matter, of which he is in seisin, cannot he taken away.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 14 2005

Workman Shri Sheo Shankar Ram Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-14-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Trade Disputes Act, 1929

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR241(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Sinha and; Amitabh, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ petition the petitioner-workman has challenged the award dated 31st January, 1997 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ranchi in Reference Case No. 8/92 whereby he has held that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2003

Basant Kumar Singh Vs. the State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Advocate for Respondent : Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Senior Adv. and Binod Bihari Sinha, Adv.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 8-8-2002 (Annexure-4) whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been transferred to Sasaram branch of the State Bank of India and in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2005

Hoti Lal and ors. Vs. A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-14-2005

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 13, Rule 2 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC690

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Sinha, ;S.P. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The short question to be determined by this Court in this writ petition is as to whether the trial court as well as revisional court were Justified in rejecting the application of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2008

Usha Breco Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Management of Usha Breco Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-29-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 11A; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96; Constitution of India - Article 51A

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR400]; JT2008(6)SC427; (2008)IILLJ945SC; 2008(7)SCALE447; (2008)5SCC554; 2009(1)SLJ322(SC); 2008AIRSCW6783; 2008(5)SCC554; 2008-II-LLJ-945; 2008(3)Supreme217

Advocate for Respondent : Ajit Kumar Sinha, ; Amitabh, ; S.K. Yashovardhan, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Application of Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act'), as noticed by this Court in Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. v. The Management and Ors. :...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2003

Apar Industries Ltd. Vs. Natwarsinh Naharsinh Sindha

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-26-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 25FF; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 54

Reported in : (2003)3GLR2701; (2004)IILLJ282Guj

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh P. Mankad, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; Mukul Sinha, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and;

P.B. Majmudar, J. 1. Since the point involved in this group of Special Civil Applications is common and since all these petitions are filed against the common Award passed by the Labour Court, Vadodara, all these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2006

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Gujarat Rajya Karmachari ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9A, 25T, 25U and 29; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR673]

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Sinha, Adv.

Ravi R. Tripathi, J. 1. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (the Corporation for brevity), through its Legal Advisor is before this Court challenging the order passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Reference (IT) No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1998

State Bank of India Employees Union and ors. Vs. State Bank of India a ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-11-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Sinha and K.K. Sinha, Advs.

N. Pandey, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner Nos.2 to 6 have questioned the validity of the order of the disciplinary authority, contained inAnnexure 1 series, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial