Advanced Search Results
Manjunath Anandappa Urf. Shivappa Hanasi Vs. Tammanasa and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-2003
PropertyContract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 34; Transfer of Property Act
AIR2003SC1391; 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)303; (2003)3MLJ50(SC); 2003(3)SCALE331; (2003)10SCC390; [2003]2SCR1068
Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. and ; Shankar Divate, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Defendant No. 3 is the appellant herein. Defendant No. 1 is admittedlythe owner of the property in suit. Defendant No. 2 is the constituted attorneyof Defendant No. 1, who, on or about 1.10.1978...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Sharan Yadav Vs. Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-30-1984
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(2)
AIR1985SC24; 1985(33)BLJR19; 1984(2)SCALE687; (1984)4SCC649; [1985]1SCR1089; 1985(17)LC229(SC)
L.R. Singh and ; A. Sharan, Advs.
S. Murtaza fazal Ali, J.1. This election appeal is directed against a judgment dated April 10, 1980 of the Patna High Court setting aside the election of the appellant mainly on the ground that he had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhagirath and Bros. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-21-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 3, Rules 4(1) and 6(2) - Order 9, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 48, Rule 1(1)
[1997]225ITR483(MP)
A.R. Tiwari, J.1. The identical relief of restoration, structured and spun on the identical ground of non-availability of senior counsel due to his having gone out of country at the relevant dates of dismissal of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bhagirath and Bros.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-21-1996
Direct Taxation
(1997)139CTR(MP)239
ORDERA. R. TIWARI, J. :Identical relief of restoration, structured and spun on identical ground of non-availability of the senior counsel due to his having gone out of country at the relevant dates of dismissal of Misc....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Ganesh Rao Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-06-2005
Service
Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; ;Bihar Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1946 - Rules 1(2), 2, 3, 5, 6, 15 and 16; ;Constitution of India- Articles 14, 16, 233 and 309; ;Uttar Pradesh Forest Service Rules, 1952; ;Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rules 6, 18, 22(1), 22(3) and 22(4)
AIR2005SC4321; 2006(1)BLJR9; [2005(107)FLR868]; [2006(2)JCR91(SC)]; JT2005(10)SC261; 2005(8)SCALE180; (2005)8SCC454; 2006(1)SLJ431(SC)
Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Anupam Lal Das and ; Rajan Raj
G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 1st April, 2003 of the High Court of Jharkhand by which the writ petition preferred by the appellants was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Mahajabeen Akhtar
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-2007
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 39 and 142
AIR2008SC435; 2008(3)JKJ79[SC]; 2007(12)SCALE771; (2008)1SCC368; 2008(2)SLJ140(SC); 2007AIRSCW7204
Sudhir Kulshreshtha, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Applicability of the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work' is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 19.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandeep Agarwal (Shri) and anr. Vs. State
Rajasthan
Apr-03-2008
Motor Vehicles
RLW2008(4)Raj3381
K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioners preferred this criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 23.6.2005 passed by Session Judge, Jhunjhunu in Criminal Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshwani Kumar Singh Vs. U.P. Public Service Commission and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2003
Service
Parliament Act
AIR2003SC2661; 2003(4)AWC2871(SC); 96(2003)CLT545(SC); [2003(3)JCR183(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC184; 2003(5)SCALE255; (2003)11SCC584; 2004(1)SLJ28(SC); (2003)3UPLBEC2240
Shail Kumar Dwivedi, ; R.C. Verma, ; Mukesh Verma and ;
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. These two appeals involve identical issues and, therefore, are taken up together.3. Factual position which is necessary to be noted for disposal of the appeals in a nutshell is as follows:4....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Essel Mining and Industries Ltd. and ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-09-2005
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 4(1) and 5(2); Mines Act; Mines Rules
100(2005)CLT498(SC); [2005(106)FLR1210]; [2005(4)JCR70(SC)]; JT2005(7)SC424; (2005)IIILLJ520SC; (2005)6SCC675
Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv., ; R.R. Kumar, ; Samyadip Chatterji
ORDERArijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court quashing Clause-iii of paragraph 7 of the Explanation in Notification No. 514(E) dated 12.07.1994 issued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and ors. Vs. Jeet S. Bisht and anr.
Supreme Court of India
May-18-2007
Civil
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9, 10(3), 16 and 16(2); Administrative Tribunal Act - Sections 10(3); Draft Pay Rules - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 50, 141, 142, 229 and 254; Public Law, 2006; Public Interest Law
2007(4)AWC3241(SC); (2008)4MLJ551(SC); 2007(8)SCALE35; (2007)6SCC586
Markandey Katju, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal furnishes a typical instance of a widespread malady which has infected the judicial system in India, namely, the tendency in some courts of not exercising judicial restraint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »