Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a sharan · Page 1 of about 3,104 results (0.367 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 2003

Manjunath Anandappa Urf. Shivappa Hanasi Vs. Tammanasa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 34; Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1391; 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)303; (2003)3MLJ50(SC); 2003(3)SCALE331; (2003)10SCC390; [2003]2SCR1068

Advocate for Respondent : Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. and ; Shankar Divate, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Defendant No. 3 is the appellant herein. Defendant No. 1 is admittedlythe owner of the property in suit. Defendant No. 2 is the constituted attorneyof Defendant No. 1, who, on or about 1.10.1978...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1984

Ram Sharan Yadav Vs. Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-1984

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(2)

Reported in : AIR1985SC24; 1985(33)BLJR19; 1984(2)SCALE687; (1984)4SCC649; [1985]1SCR1089; 1985(17)LC229(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : L.R. Singh and ; A. Sharan, Advs.

S. Murtaza fazal Ali, J.1. This election appeal is directed against a judgment dated April 10, 1980 of the Patna High Court setting aside the election of the appellant mainly on the ground that he had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhagirath and Bros. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 3, Rules 4(1) and 6(2) - Order 9, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 48, Rule 1(1)

Reported in : [1997]225ITR483(MP)

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. The identical relief of restoration, structured and spun on the identical ground of non-availability of senior counsel due to his having gone out of country at the relevant dates of dismissal of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1996

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bhagirath and Bros.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)139CTR(MP)239

ORDERA. R. TIWARI, J. :Identical relief of restoration, structured and spun on identical ground of non-availability of the senior counsel due to his having gone out of country at the relevant dates of dismissal of Misc....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2005

D. Ganesh Rao Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-06-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; ;Bihar Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1946 - Rules 1(2), 2, 3, 5, 6, 15 and 16; ;Constitution of India- Articles 14, 16, 233 and 309; ;Uttar Pradesh Forest Service Rules, 1952; ;Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rules 6, 18, 22(1), 22(3) and 22(4)

Reported in : AIR2005SC4321; 2006(1)BLJR9; [2005(107)FLR868]; [2006(2)JCR91(SC)]; JT2005(10)SC261; 2005(8)SCALE180; (2005)8SCC454; 2006(1)SLJ431(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Anupam Lal Das and ; Rajan Raj

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 1st April, 2003 of the High Court of Jharkhand by which the writ petition preferred by the appellants was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2007

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Mahajabeen Akhtar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-01-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 39 and 142

Reported in : AIR2008SC435; 2008(3)JKJ79[SC]; 2007(12)SCALE771; (2008)1SCC368; 2008(2)SLJ140(SC); 2007AIRSCW7204

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhir Kulshreshtha, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Applicability of the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work' is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 19.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2008

Sandeep Agarwal (Shri) and anr. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-03-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3381

K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioners preferred this criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 23.6.2005 passed by Session Judge, Jhunjhunu in Criminal Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2003

Ashwani Kumar Singh Vs. U.P. Public Service Commission and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Parliament Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC2661; 2003(4)AWC2871(SC); 96(2003)CLT545(SC); [2003(3)JCR183(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC184; 2003(5)SCALE255; (2003)11SCC584; 2004(1)SLJ28(SC); (2003)3UPLBEC2240

Advocate for Respondent : Shail Kumar Dwivedi, ; R.C. Verma, ; Mukesh Verma and ;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. These two appeals involve identical issues and, therefore, are taken up together.3. Factual position which is necessary to be noted for disposal of the appeals in a nutshell is as follows:4....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Essel Mining and Industries Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 4(1) and 5(2); Mines Act; Mines Rules

Reported in : 100(2005)CLT498(SC); [2005(106)FLR1210]; [2005(4)JCR70(SC)]; JT2005(7)SC424; (2005)IIILLJ520SC; (2005)6SCC675

Advocate for Respondent : Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv., ; R.R. Kumar, ; Samyadip Chatterji

ORDERArijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court quashing Clause-iii of paragraph 7 of the Explanation in Notification No. 514(E) dated 12.07.1994 issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2007

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Jeet S. Bisht and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9, 10(3), 16 and 16(2); Administrative Tribunal Act - Sections 10(3); Draft Pay Rules - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 50, 141, 142, 229 and 254; Public Law, 2006; Public Interest Law

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3241(SC); (2008)4MLJ551(SC); 2007(8)SCALE35; (2007)6SCC586

Markandey Katju, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal furnishes a typical instance of a widespread malady which has infected the judicial system in India, namely, the tendency in some courts of not exercising judicial restraint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial