Advanced Search Results

Debasish Basu Vs. Jayanta Bikash Dhar Alias Jayanta Dhar

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21 - Order 7, Rule 10

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Sengupta, D. Datta and K. Majumder, Advs.

B.P. Katakey, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28.2.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), North Tripura, Kailashahar in Money Suit No. 2 of 2003 directing that the question of...

Indian School Ofbusiness,hyderab Vs. the Commissioner of Customsand Ce ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI SANJAY KUMAR CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.25 OF201426-02-2014 Indian School of Business,Hyderabad. ..Appellant The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise,Hyderabad-IV Division Commissionerate,Hyderabad...Respondent Counsel for...

Kanan Bala Banik Vs. Babul Chandra Deb

Court : Guwahati

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Sengupta and M.K. Majumdar, Advs.

H.K.K. Singh, J.1. In this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for quashing the judgment and order dated 25.11.1999 passed by the learned District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in...

Narayan Roy Vs. the State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 8(1)

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Sengupta, Govt. Adv.

D.N. Baruah, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 31-5-85 passed by the Subordinate Judge, West Tripura District, Agartala in T.S. No. 118 (Arb) of 1983, rejecting the application under S: 8(2)...

Srichand P. Hinduja Vs. State Through C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 161, 165A, 420, 464 and 465; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 67, 74(1), 76, 78 and 78(6); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 166A, 212(1), 213, 362, 395, 482 and 561A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT1; 2005(82)DRJ494

Advocate for Respondent : B. Datta, ASG, ; U.S. Prasad, Spl. PP and ; Naveen J. Matta

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of Crl. M.A. 169/2005 and 170/2005 in Crl. Rev. 271/2004, Crl. M.A. 171/2005 and 172/2005 in Crl. Rev. 272/2004, Crl. M.A. 173/2005 and 174/2005 in Crl.Rev. 273/2004, preferred by...

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Mahad ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal Regulation of Recruitment in State Government Establishments and Establishments of Public Undertakings Statutory Bodies, Government Companies and Local Autorities Act, 1999 - Section 3

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN1

Advocate for Respondent : Partha Sarathi Sengupta and ;Debjani Sengupta, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. In this appeal, the basic questions that arise for consideration are:(1) Whether the selection process that has commenced when different circulars and executive instructions held the field should bo completed on the...

Satyam Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Improvement Trus ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911 - Sections 43, 43(1), 47(1) and 49(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1989Cal263,93CWN603

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Sengupta, ;M.N. Dasgupta and ;Sujit Basu, Advs.;S. Ukil and ;;Pradip Ghose, ;Barin Banerjee and ;Roma Banerjee, Advs.

ORDERPrabir Kumar Majumdar, J.1. By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution the legality and validity of the acquisition proceedings -initiated in respect of No. 9B, Bechulal Road, Calcutta -- 14 has been challenged by...

Duncan Brothers and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Schedule - Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : [1981]128ITR302(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Suhas Sen and ;Ajit Sengupta, Advs.

Sen, J.1. This reference arises out of an assessment of Duncan Brothers & Co., under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), in the assessment year 1965-66, the previous year...

Suraj Konar and ors. Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Calcutta University Act, 1979 - Sections 22, 54 and 55; ;Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Respondent : Partha Sarathi Sengupta, ;Sambuddha Chakraborty and ;Biswarup Bhattacharjee, Advs.

Dipankar Datta, J.1. 'Merit must be the test when choosing the best', said Hon'ble V.R. Krishna Iyer, J. in Dr. Jagdish Saran and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. reported in : AIR 1980 SC...

Dwarka Prasad Bajaj Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254 and 256 to 260; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [1980]126ITR219(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Ajit Sengupta, Adv.

Dipak Kumar Sen, J. 1. In this application of Dwarka Prasad Bajaj, the assessee, made in the above reference a rule nisi was issued calling upon the Commissioner, West Bengal-I, to show cause why the amount...