Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a saravanan · Page 1 of about 3,061 results (0.175 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 2012

V.Selvakumar Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 153(A), 188 and 34; Constitution of India - Article 14, 21

ORDER1. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Heard Mr.P.Rathinam learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Saravanan for Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent corporation.2. The petitioner is before this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1993

A. Ramu Vs. Ramaswamy and Anothers

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2544

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Arunagirinathan and;M. Md. Ibrahim Ali, Advs.,;Mr. G. Kumaravel, Government Adv.

ORDER1. The victim girl aged about 35 years by name Ramu daughter of one Arunachala founder of Pothireddipatti village in Sattar Taluk, the complainant and examined as P.W. 1 before the trial Court has filed this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, and anr. Vs. M/S.Mohan Breweries a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-20-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.C.Saravanan. Adv.

1. Substantial question of law that arises for consideration in this appeal is "whether the second respondent was correct in law in allowing the MODVAT benefits when the sub-heading 8429.00 is one of the specifically excluded...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 2001

Pandian Roadways Corporation Ltd. Vs. Principal Labour Court and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-23-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 21, 37 and 39; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 12, 18(1) and 33C(2)

Reported in : (2002)ILLJ111Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Kalaiselvi, Special G.P. for Respondent No. 2 and ;Kamala Priya, Adv. for ;D. Saravanan, Adv. for Respondents 3 to 70

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. This writ appeal preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent has been preferred againstthe order of the learned single Judge, dated October 27, 1993, made in Writ Petition No. 534 of 1995 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2009

S. Ram Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Finance, Department ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-04-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Patents Act, 1970; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 128, 128A, 128A(4A), 129 and 129A; National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 - Sections 15; Motor Vehicles Act; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act - Sections 9; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act; Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 - Rules 3, 3(2), 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 226, 226(2) and 227

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ990

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Senthilkumar, Standing Counsel for Respondents 1 and 2 in W.P. No. 9934/2009 and Respondents 1, 2 and 4 in W.P. Nos. 9935, 10264, 10432 and 10730/2009, ;P. Saravanan, Adv. for 3rd Respondent in W

ORDERN. Paul Vasanthakumar, J.1. The prayer in these writ petitions are to quash the orders dated 18.5.2009 and 20.5.2009, passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, insofar as W.P. Nos. 9934 and 9935 of 2009...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2010

Sherwine Tom. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-27-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.Saravanan, Adv.

1. Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.A.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3. None represented the 4th respondent College, though they have been served.2. The petitioners have challenged the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Mohan (Deceased),

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30

Reported in : 2004ACJ2046; (2003)IIILLJ890Mad; (2003)2MLJ443

Advocate for Respondent : R. Saravanan, Adv. for ;A.S. Farida for Respondent-3

1. The Oriental Insurance Company, Virudhunagar, aggrieved by the order of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner (Deputy Commissioner for Labour), Madurai dated 08.08.1994 made in W.C. No. 171 of 1993 has preferred the above appeal.2. In respect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2010

K.P.S.Jeyachandran . Vs. State Represented by Deputy Superintendent of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-29-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), 1973 - Section 482

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.Saravanan, Adv.

1. The petitioner, who is the sole accused in C.C.No.568 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Erode seeks to quash proceedings in such case.2.The case in Crime No.167 of 2003 was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 2011

P.Anand Vs. the Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-06-2011

Subject : Education

Acts : Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University, Chennai Act, 1987 - Sections 29(3), 44(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 33; MCI Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 12(4); Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.Saravanan; Mr.V.P.Raman; Mr.G.Sankaran, Advs.

1. The writ petitioners are all final year M.B.B.S. students of the academic year 2010-2011 and they have all sought a writ of declaration to declare that the impugned guidelines, viz., Guidelines for Clinical/Viva Voce Examinations...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2015

Vijay and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-22-2015

Subject : Criminal

Per Court: All these criminal appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 18/10/2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.554/2002. For the sake of convenience, accused numbers are referred according...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial