Advanced Search Results

Santu Lal Gupta Vs. Bihar State Financial Corporation and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Advocate for Respondent : A. Sahay, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. Pursuant to the judgment and order of remand passed by a Division Bench in LPA No. 475/99 (R), I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing...

Bhagwan Das Verma Vs. Ram Briksha Sonar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR335(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Devendra Kumar Sahay, Adv.

Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. The petitioner, in this writ application, has prayed for setting aside the order dated 20.12.2005, passed by Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Koderma in Title Appeal No. 1 of 1991, whereby...

Bijay Kumar Verma and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages act, 1936 - Sections 1(4), 2 and 15(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR458]; [2004(1)JCR472(Jhr)]; (2004)IILLJ927Jhar

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Sahay, Sr. S.C. II and; Prabhash Kumar, Adv.

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J. 1. The Petitioners being the Secretary, Treasurer, the President of the Managing Committee of Amrit Nagar High School, Karra, District-Hazaribagh have challenged the order dated 13.03.2001, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Authority under the...

Dr. Kedar Nath and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Aftab Alam, J.1. Except for the difference in the subjects of teaching these two writ petitions are exactly similar on all material points. These two cases were, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by...

Ashok Kumar Sahay Vs. Rama Shankar Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act - Section 11(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act - Section 3

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC638

S. Mohan and; M.K. Mukherjee, JJ.1. Though the appellant-landlord succeeded in the trial court, that success was actually short-lived. The High Court reversed the decree. The landlord obtained a decree for eviction on the ground of...

Director of School Education, Madras and ors. Vs. O. Karuppa thevan an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC666; (1996)1UPLBEC347

P.B. Sawant and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. Though the appellant-landlord succeeded in the trial court, that success was actually short-lived. The High Court reversed the decree. The landlord obtained a decree for eviction on the ground of...

Pratapchand and ors. Vs. Lakshman Prasad Gupta

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Encumbered Estates Act - Sections 4; Limitation Act - Sections 14, 15 and 15(1) - Schedule - Articles 181 and 182; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -Sections 48

Reported in : AIR1967Mad98

Ramamurthi, J.(1) This case illustrates the proverbial thorny path of execution which the decreeholder has to pursue before he is able to realise the decree. The decree in this case was passed by the Sub Court...

Smt. Meena Sinha Vs. Naresh Kumar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicle Act, 1988

Reported in : I(2004)ACC641; [2004(1)JCR267(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Sidheshwar Prasad, Adv. for the respondent No. 1 and; D.C. Ghose, Adv. for the respondent No. 4

ORDER1. Anil Kumar Sinha, aged about 38 years was employed as Mining Inspector in the office of District Mining Office, Dhanbad. On 29th April, 1978, while going on his scooter (BRR 8938) at the junction of...

Debendra Dehri Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR367(Jhr)]

1. By the impugned judgment dated 12.3.2003 in SC No. 90 of 2001 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge. Dumka, the sole appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian...

Bibi Salma Khatoon Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR2001SC3596; 2001(49)BLJR2096; JT2001(7)SC109; 2001(5)SCALE474; (2001)7SCC197

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Singh, ; Prem Sunder Jha, ; M.D. Pandeya and ;

ORDER1. Leave is granted. 2. The appellant, an unsuccessful applicant under Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') claiming right of pre-emption in respect of the land in dispute, is...