Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a s virk · Page 1 of about 439 results (0.151 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 18 2007

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. A.K. Narula

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2007SC2296; 2007(8)SCALE251; 2007AIRSCW3987

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv. and ; Kumud L. Das, Adv.

R.V. Raveendran, J.1. Leave granted.Union of India has filed this appeal by special leave against the judgment and order dated 27.5.2005 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Civil W.P. No. 4455/2004. 2. Respondent was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2005

Sawinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-09-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2006CriLJ761

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Virk, Addl. AG

Pritam Pal, J.1. Appellants --Sawinder Singh (70 years) and his wife, Smt. Rachna (70 years), have filed this appeal against judgment and order dated 6-2-1997 whereby they were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2005

Jagtar Singh S/O Jagan Nath Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-10-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4400

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Virk, Addl. A.G., Punjab

Pritam Pal, J.1. Appellant Jagtar Singh has brought his appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated September 1, 2000, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridkot, whereby he was convicted Sub-section 302...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 05 2005

Santokh Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-05-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4615

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Virk, Addl. A.G., Punjab;for State assisted by; Smile Dhir, Adv.

Pritam Pal, J.1. Santokh Singh and Satnam Singh, who are alleged to have committed the murder of their father Rattan Singh, have brought this appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11-2-1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2000

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Vide Devil

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-23-2000

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 2(46) and 166

Reported in : II(2001)ACC266; 2001ACJ1881

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Virk and; Mr. Narotam Kaushal, Advs.

R.L. Anand, J.1. This F.A.O. has been directed against the award dated 15.9.1994, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal; Ambala, which allowed the claim petition and claimants were awarded a sum of Rs. 1,95,000/-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2000

Sarwan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-31-2000

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4280

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Dhaliwal, DAG; A.S. Virk and; D.S. Walia, Advs.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The appellant, Sarwan Singh, is found to have murdered his father Kirpal Singh. The brother and the mother are the witnesses against him. The trial Court has found him guilty of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1994

Mamta Rani Vs. Satish Kumar Gogia

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-05-1994

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125(4)

Reported in : I(1996)DMC40; (1995)109PLR296

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Virk, Adv.

H.S. Bedi, J.1. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Vide order dated 18th October, 1993, two applications for interim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. of the Code of Criminal Procedure one filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2014

Present: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj Advocate Vs. Ajaib Singh and Others .... ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-2014

Subject : Education

CRM33578of 2013 in CRA S2651SB of 2011 Manjeet alias Sonu v. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant MRS.Loveleen Kaur Dhaliwal Singla, Sr.DAG, Haryana -.- No ground for suspension of sentence, at this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2009

Anami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 8 and 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 32, 141, 142, 144, 164(1A), 245, 246 and 311; Advocates Act, 1961; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 4A; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954; India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 6 and 7(1); Indian Police Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981; All India Services (Deathcum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 and 16(1A); Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3(2A); Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10 and 10(5); Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Kadam, Adv. General, ;V.S. Masurkar and ;D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleaders for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. (L) No. 2528/2008, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in W.P. (L) No. 2552

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Rule in both the Writ Petitions. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, Rule called out and heard finally at the admission stage itself.Facts2. The State of Maharashtra vide its order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2013

Mr. R.K.Singla Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others................ ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-20-2013

Subject : Education

Crl. Misc. No.963 of 2012 and [ 1 ].Crl. W.P.No.926 of 2012 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.963 of 2012 and Crl. W.P.No.926 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial