Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. A.K. Narula
Supreme Court of India
May-18-2007
Service
AIR2007SC2296; 2007(8)SCALE251; 2007AIRSCW3987
S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv. and ; Kumud L. Das, Adv.
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. Leave granted.Union of India has filed this appeal by special leave against the judgment and order dated 27.5.2005 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Civil W.P. No. 4455/2004. 2. Respondent was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSawinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-09-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2006CriLJ761
A.S. Virk, Addl. AG
Pritam Pal, J.1. Appellants --Sawinder Singh (70 years) and his wife, Smt. Rachna (70 years), have filed this appeal against judgment and order dated 6-2-1997 whereby they were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagtar Singh S/O Jagan Nath Vs. the State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-10-2005
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2005CriLJ4400
A.S. Virk, Addl. A.G., Punjab
Pritam Pal, J.1. Appellant Jagtar Singh has brought his appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated September 1, 2000, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridkot, whereby he was convicted Sub-section 302...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Santokh Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-05-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2005CriLJ4615
A.S. Virk, Addl. A.G., Punjab;for State assisted by; Smile Dhir, Adv.
Pritam Pal, J.1. Santokh Singh and Satnam Singh, who are alleged to have committed the murder of their father Rattan Singh, have brought this appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11-2-1997...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Vide Devil
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-23-2000
Insurance
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 2(46) and 166
II(2001)ACC266; 2001ACJ1881
Mr. S.S. Virk and; Mr. Narotam Kaushal, Advs.
R.L. Anand, J.1. This F.A.O. has been directed against the award dated 15.9.1994, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal; Ambala, which allowed the claim petition and claimants were awarded a sum of Rs. 1,95,000/-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarwan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
May-31-2000
Criminal
2000CriLJ4280
S.S. Dhaliwal, DAG; A.S. Virk and; D.S. Walia, Advs.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The appellant, Sarwan Singh, is found to have murdered his father Kirpal Singh. The brother and the mother are the witnesses against him. The trial Court has found him guilty of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMamta Rani Vs. Satish Kumar Gogia
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-05-1994
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125(4)
I(1996)DMC40; (1995)109PLR296
A.S. Virk, Adv.
H.S. Bedi, J.1. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Vide order dated 18th October, 1993, two applications for interim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. of the Code of Criminal Procedure one filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj Advocate Vs. Ajaib Singh and Others .... ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-11-2014
Education
CRM33578of 2013 in CRA S2651SB of 2011 Manjeet alias Sonu v. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant MRS.Loveleen Kaur Dhaliwal Singla, Sr.DAG, Haryana -.- No ground for suspension of sentence, at this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...
Mumbai
Feb-05-2009
Service
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 8 and 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 32, 141, 142, 144, 164(1A), 245, 246 and 311; Advocates Act, 1961; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 4A; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954; India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 6 and 7(1); Indian Police Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981; All India Services (Deathcum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 and 16(1A); Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3(2A); Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10 and 10(5); Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955
2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869
R.M. Kadam, Adv. General, ;V.S. Masurkar and ;D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleaders for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. (L) No. 2528/2008, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in W.P. (L) No. 2552
Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Rule in both the Writ Petitions. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, Rule called out and heard finally at the admission stage itself.Facts2. The State of Maharashtra vide its order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. R.K.Singla Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others................ ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-20-2013
Education
Crl. Misc. No.963 of 2012 and [ 1 ].Crl. W.P.No.926 of 2012 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.963 of 2012 and Crl. W.P.No.926 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »