Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a s jha · Page 1 of about 3,465 results (0.111 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Apr 08 2000

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Meghnath and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 165, 168, 169, 173 173(1) and 173(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24, 25, 115 and 115(2) - Order 43; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 136(1) and 227; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110 and 110C; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10-A

Reported in : 2001ACJ627; AIR2001MP36; 2001(2)MPHT258; 2000(3)MPLJ246

Advocate for Respondent : Shri H.S. Ruprah and ;Shri A.S. Jha, Amicus Curiae

ORDERA.K. Mishra, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Civil Revision No. 3037/99 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rajmani).2. Common question has arisen in the present two revisions as to the maintainability of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 12 2002

Manohar Singh Marwaha Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP136

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G.

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the Gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 01 2001

Ku. Prachi Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2001

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Pre Medical Test Examination Rules, 2000 - Rule 2.5.1

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT657

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G. and ;Rakesh Shroti, Adv. for the respondent No. 3

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to consider the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Dec 16 1994

Harichand Budhram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 226, 309 and 311; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education Rules - Rule 39

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ53

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Jha and ;Tannu Tandon, Advs.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, direction or order for quashing of the order of transfer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 02 2004

G.S. Associate Vs. Kamlendra Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT275; 2004(3)MPLJ286

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Sr. Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and ; Rohit Arya, Sr. Adv. for the Respondent No. 2

Dipak Misra, J.1. The spinal issue that has spiralled to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short 'BSNL') had acted in conformity with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 25 2000

Suryakant Chandrakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR2000MP260

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Ghildiyal, Govt. Adv., ;R.S. Jha and ;Ahluwalia, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Suryakant Chandrakar (petitioner in W.P. No. 3715/1998), Mukund Marotirao Khanti (petitioner in W.P. No. 2704/98) as also Smt. Gyani Lunia, (respondent No. 3 in both the writ petitions), Manju Kiran Kalia (respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Feb 29 2000

Adhartal Shiksha Samiti and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 38, 50 and 76BB; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh (Vikasit Bhoomiya, Griho, Bhavno Tatha Anya Sanrachnaon Ka Vyayan) Niyam, 1975 - Rule 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2001MP3; 2000(3)MPLJ43

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. Adv.-Gen. for Respondent 1 and ;S. Nagu, Adv. for Respondent 2

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. In all these writ petitions, common questions of law with little variation of facts arise for determination and as such they are being disposed of by this common order.2. Jabalpur Development Authority (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 25 2000

Mukund Marotirao Khanti and Etc. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 6, 7 and 7(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2001MP30

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Ghildiyal, ;R.S. Jha and ;G.S. Ahluwalia, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Suryakant Chandrakar (petitioner in W.P. No. 3715/1998), Mukund Marotirao Khanti (petitioner in W.P. No. 2704/98) as also Smt. Gyani Lunia, (respondent No. 3 in both the writ petitions), Manju Kiran Kalia (respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jul 17 2003

Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT391

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. Advocate General

ORDER1. When complex situations arise and emergencies and exigencies usher in, not only immediate diagnosis is required but a peremptory treatment becomes absolutely indispensable, in a way, irrefragably inevitable.2. The factual matrix of the present case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 20 2003

Ku. Ruchira Guha Vs. Professional Examination Board and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-20-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh and Dental Graduate Entrance Examination Rules, 2003 - Rules 5.0 and 9.3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT241; 2004(3)MPLJ54

Advocate for Respondent : Shobha Menon, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.S. Jha, Dy. Adv. General for Respondent No. 2

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for declaration of Rule 3.9.2 of M.P. Medical and Dental Graduate Entrance Rules,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales