Advanced Search Results
Manohar Singh Marwaha Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-12-2002
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6
AIR2003MP136
R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G.
Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the Gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Meghnath and Another
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-08-2000
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 165, 168, 169, 173 173(1) and 173(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24, 25, 115 and 115(2) - Order 43; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 136(1) and 227; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110 and 110C; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10-A
2001ACJ627; AIR2001MP36; 2001(2)MPHT258; 2000(3)MPLJ246
Shri H.S. Ruprah and ;Shri A.S. Jha, Amicus Curiae
ORDERA.K. Mishra, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Civil Revision No. 3037/99 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rajmani).2. Common question has arisen in the present two revisions as to the maintainability of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKu. Prachi Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-01-2001
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Pre Medical Test Examination Rules, 2000 - Rule 2.5.1
2001(5)MPHT657
R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G. and ;Rakesh Shroti, Adv. for the respondent No. 3
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to consider the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Harichand Budhram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-16-1994
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 226, 309 and 311; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education Rules - Rule 39
1996(0)MPLJ53
S.S. Jha and ;Tannu Tandon, Advs.
ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, direction or order for quashing of the order of transfer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.S. Associate Vs. Kamlendra Singh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-02-2004
Commercial
Constitution of India - Article 226
2004(4)MPHT275; 2004(3)MPLJ286
R.S. Jha, Sr. Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and ; Rohit Arya, Sr. Adv. for the Respondent No. 2
Dipak Misra, J.1. The spinal issue that has spiralled to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short 'BSNL') had acted in conformity with the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLarsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-15-2003
Other Taxes
Constitution of India - Articles 3, 19(1), 265, 277, 278, 286 and 372; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 4 and 9; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax (Amendment) Act, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 75, 76,77, 78,79, 80, 81, 83, 85, 113, 119 and 120; Madhya Pradesh Deferment of Tax Rules, 1986; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12 and 22D; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13; State Re-organisation Act, 1956 - Sections 15; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Act, 1952; Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 89; Adaptation of Laws Order, 2002; Chhattisgarh Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam
[2004]137STC269(MP)
R.S. Jha, Deputy Advocate-General for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.K. Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 3
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. The facts and law being common in both the appeals preferred under clause 10 of the Letters Patent, they were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order.2. The centripetal issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharati Telenet Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial ...
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-01-2003
Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 9, 10 and 12; Constitution of India - Article 14 and 226
[2006]146STC243(MP)
R.S. Jha, D.A.G.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for a declaration that the notification contained in annexure P-4 is violative of Section 3(2) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuryakant Chandrakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-25-2000
Civil
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 6 and 7
AIR2000MP260
K.C. Ghildiyal, Govt. Adv., ;R.S. Jha and ;Ahluwalia, Advs.
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Suryakant Chandrakar (petitioner in W.P. No. 3715/1998), Mukund Marotirao Khanti (petitioner in W.P. No. 2704/98) as also Smt. Gyani Lunia, (respondent No. 3 in both the writ petitions), Manju Kiran Kalia (respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-01-2002
CivilConstitution
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 8A; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 74 and 85
AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10
Rajendra Tiwari, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jha, Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The pivotal issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition preferred by a learned member of the Bar whether the members of the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh are entitled...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdhartal Shiksha Samiti and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-29-2000
PropertyCivil
Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 38, 50 and 76BB; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh (Vikasit Bhoomiya, Griho, Bhavno Tatha Anya Sanrachnaon Ka Vyayan) Niyam, 1975 - Rule 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR2001MP3; 2000(3)MPLJ43
R.S. Jha, Dy. Adv.-Gen. for Respondent 1 and ;S. Nagu, Adv. for Respondent 2
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. In all these writ petitions, common questions of law with little variation of facts arise for determination and as such they are being disposed of by this common order.2. Jabalpur Development Authority (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »