Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a s jha · Page 1 of about 3,463 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 12 2002

Manohar Singh Marwaha Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP136

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G.

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the Gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2000

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Meghnath and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 165, 168, 169, 173 173(1) and 173(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24, 25, 115 and 115(2) - Order 43; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 136(1) and 227; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110 and 110C; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10-A

Reported in : 2001ACJ627; AIR2001MP36; 2001(2)MPHT258; 2000(3)MPLJ246

Advocate for Respondent : Shri H.S. Ruprah and ;Shri A.S. Jha, Amicus Curiae

ORDERA.K. Mishra, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Civil Revision No. 3037/99 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rajmani).2. Common question has arisen in the present two revisions as to the maintainability of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2001

Ku. Prachi Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2001

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Pre Medical Test Examination Rules, 2000 - Rule 2.5.1

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT657

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G. and ;Rakesh Shroti, Adv. for the respondent No. 3

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to consider the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 16 1994

Harichand Budhram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 226, 309 and 311; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education Rules - Rule 39

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ53

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Jha and ;Tannu Tandon, Advs.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, direction or order for quashing of the order of transfer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2004

G.S. Associate Vs. Kamlendra Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT275; 2004(3)MPLJ286

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Sr. Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and ; Rohit Arya, Sr. Adv. for the Respondent No. 2

Dipak Misra, J.1. The spinal issue that has spiralled to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short 'BSNL') had acted in conformity with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2003

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-2003

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 3, 19(1), 265, 277, 278, 286 and 372; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 4 and 9; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax (Amendment) Act, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 75, 76,77, 78,79, 80, 81, 83, 85, 113, 119 and 120; Madhya Pradesh Deferment of Tax Rules, 1986; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12 and 22D; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13; State Re-organisation Act, 1956 - Sections 15; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Act, 1952; Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 89; Adaptation of Laws Order, 2002; Chhattisgarh Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam

Reported in : [2004]137STC269(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Deputy Advocate-General for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.K. Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. The facts and law being common in both the appeals preferred under clause 10 of the Letters Patent, they were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order.2. The centripetal issue...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2003

Bharati Telenet Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-2003

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 9, 10 and 12; Constitution of India - Article 14 and 226

Reported in : [2006]146STC243(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, D.A.G.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for a declaration that the notification contained in annexure P-4 is violative of Section 3(2) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2000

Suryakant Chandrakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR2000MP260

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Ghildiyal, Govt. Adv., ;R.S. Jha and ;Ahluwalia, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Suryakant Chandrakar (petitioner in W.P. No. 3715/1998), Mukund Marotirao Khanti (petitioner in W.P. No. 2704/98) as also Smt. Gyani Lunia, (respondent No. 3 in both the writ petitions), Manju Kiran Kalia (respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2002

Radhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 8A; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 74 and 85

Reported in : AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10

Advocate for Respondent : Rajendra Tiwari, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jha, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The pivotal issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition preferred by a learned member of the Bar whether the members of the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh are entitled...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2000

Adhartal Shiksha Samiti and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 38, 50 and 76BB; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh (Vikasit Bhoomiya, Griho, Bhavno Tatha Anya Sanrachnaon Ka Vyayan) Niyam, 1975 - Rule 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2001MP3; 2000(3)MPLJ43

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Jha, Dy. Adv.-Gen. for Respondent 1 and ;S. Nagu, Adv. for Respondent 2

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. In all these writ petitions, common questions of law with little variation of facts arise for determination and as such they are being disposed of by this common order.2. Jabalpur Development Authority (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial