Advanced Search Results

Sri Laxmi Touring Talkies and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 358; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1971 - Rules 30, 90, 92, 93, 94, 98, 98(2), 99, 100, 104, 107 and 107(1); Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) (Amendment) Rules, 1974 - Rules 11 and 16; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 2(4), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19(1) and 19(2); Hyderabad Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952

Reported in : ILR1975KAR481; 1975(1)KarLJ419

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General, ;P.G. Gowri, ;G.B. Raikar, ;S.G. Bhat and ;S.G. Sundara Swamy, Advs.

ORDER1. The petitioners are exhibitors of touring cinemas. They had been granted licences for running touring cinemas in different places. They had applied for re-grant of such licences for continuing to run the touring cinemas in...

Hemendra Rasiklal Ghia Vs. Subodh Mody

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 4, 5, 21, 33, 36, 66, 91, 92, 93 and 123; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 27; Stamp Act - Sections 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 89 - Order 7, Rule 14 - Order 8, Rules 1, 1A, 6G and 8A - Order 12, Rule 2 and 2A - Order 13, Rules 1, 3, 4, 4(1) and 6 - Order 18, Rules 2(4), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 4(6), 4(7), 4(8), 17A, 18 and 19 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 26, Rules 4A, 16, 16A, 17 and 18; Constitution of India - Article 21; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR352; 2008(6)MhLj886

Advocate for Respondent : N.Y. Gupte, Adv. in W.P. No. 623 of 2005, ;S.G. Aney, Sr. Counsel and ;S.V. Mhatre, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 in W.P. No. 1902 of 2005, ;R.M. Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 4 in W.P. No. 1902

Vijay C. Daga, J.1. The question presented in these cases require us to resolve two conflicting lines of precedents on the one hand, as the Court stress that 'it is necessary for Court to decide about...

Syed Pasha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 60

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4123; 2004(7)KarLJ735

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Rajendra Reddy, HCGP

N.S. Veerabhadraiah, J.1. The appellant-accused has filed this appeal, assailing the judgment of conviction of the accused for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC, in SC No. 91 of 1991, by the learned Sessions Judge,...

Venkatesh @ Tiger Venkatesh @ English Venkatesh Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84, 304, 307 and 341

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1112; ILR2005KAR538; 2005(1)KarLJ612

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Rajendra Reddy, HCGP

N.S. Veerabhadraiah, J.1. This appeal is by the appellant - accused assailing the judgment of conviction dated 18.11.98 for the offence under Sections 307 and 341 I.P.C. in S.C. No. 93/93 rendered by the I Additional...

State of Karnataka Vs. Rajan S/O Keshavan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994(1)ALT(Cri)464; 1994CriLJ1042; ILR1994KAR318; 1994(1)KarLJ237

Advocate for Respondent : A. Sambamurthy, Adv. and ;S.G. Bhagavan, Amicus Curiae

Hiremath, J.1. Five accused took trial in the Sessions Court for offences under sections 449, 396 & 307 I.P.C. and all of them were convicted under sections 449, 396, 307 & 395 IPC and each of...

S.G. Nayak and anr. Vs. Canara Bank and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Canara Bank Officer Employees

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3449

N. Kumar, J. 1. As Identical charges are levelled against the petitioners, common enquiry was conducted, common evidence adduced, though separate orders are passed, common questions of law and facts arise for consideration in these two...

Arun Kumar Krishnarao Balpande Vs. Wasudeorao Kondbaji Ganar and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 20(3), 129 and 215; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 376

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1091; 1996(1)MhLj491

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Aney, ;M.M. Agnihotri, ;S. Sanyal, ;S.P. Dhole, ;B.A. Udhoji, ;Mrs. S.M. Mudaliyar, ; Miss S.M. Muley, ;C.S. Kaptan, ;Ramesh Darda, ;M.G. Bhangade and ;V.V. Bhangade, Advs. and ;H. Ahmad, A.P.P.

L. Manoharan, J.1. By this criminal contempt petition, the petitioner seeks to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction of this Court to punish the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 14 for having committed criminal contempt of...

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

1. The above Writ Petitions have been filed invoking the Writ Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 27th August 2009 passed by the learned District Judge,...

Survodaya Mills Workers Union Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32 and 226; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 4, 5(3), 6 to 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20(2), 21(1), 22(1), 23 and 24; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Rules - Rule 11A; State Bank of India Act, 1955; State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959; Banking companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; Banking Regulation, Act 1949; Industrial Finance Corporation of India Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-O

Reported in : AIR1994Kant256; ILR1994KAR687

Advocate for Respondent : K. Vishwanatha, ;S.G. Sundaraswamy, and ;N.K. Patil, Advs.

ORDER1. The petition was listed in the preliminary hearing Group 'B'. By consent of the counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard on merits and disposed offinally.This petition is presented by the petitioner for...

Vikki @ Vijaykumar Vs. State of Harihar Town Represented by Its S.P.P.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 376, 417 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3787; ILR2008KAR3344

Advocate for Respondent : H.C. Siddagangaiah, HCGP

V. Jagannathan, J.1. The appellant calls in question his conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 417 of the I.P.C. and consequent sentence passed by the trial court.2. The prosecutrix aged 22 years, being...