Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a rajashekar reddy · Page 1 of about 64 results (0.101 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 05 2007

A. Srinivas Rao Vs. Commr. of Cus. and Central Excise

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-05-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2009[15]STR745

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rajashekar Reddy, ASG

ORDERBilal Nazki, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction that the respondents should not give effect to the notice dated 28-12-2006 served on the petitioner on 13-1-2007.3. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2008

Andhra Pradesh Lpg Dealers Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. b ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-25-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 8 and 8(3); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19(6) and 226; Andhra Pradesh Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Order, 1980

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT268

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rajashekar Reddy, ASG, ;P.V. Sanjay Kumar and ;O. Manohar Reddy, Advs.

ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. Heard Sri N. Subba Reddy, the learned senior counsel instructed by Sri K. Ananda Rao, the learned Counsel for some of the petitioners; M/s P. Venugopal, M.V. Rajaram, Srinivas Dammalapati, K. Bheema Rao,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2007

Srinidhi Electro Mechanics Rep. by Its Proprietor, M. Upendra Reddy Vs ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-2007

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Mysore Excise Act, 1901; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD89; 2008(5)ALT579

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rajashekar Reddy, Learned Assistant Solicitor General for 1st Respondent and ;Wajid Ali Kamil, Adv. for 2nd Respondent

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner, Sri A. Rajashekar Reddy, learned Assistant Solicitor General, representing respondent No. 1, and Sri Wajid Ali Kamil, learned Counsel representing respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 18 2007

K. Raja Gopal Rao Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Deputy Secreta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-18-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hyderabad State Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(2)ALT691

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rajashekar Reddy, Asst. Solicitor General for Respondent No. 1

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. This is the third round of litigation by the petitioner in relation to his claim for grant of pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 (for short, 'the 1980 Scheme'). Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2006

Sridhar Paints Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-17-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : 2007(208)ELT18(AP); [2007]8STJ406(AP); 2008[11]STR88

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rajashekar Reddy, SCCG

ORDER1. Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed in support of the Petition, the High Court will have pleased to stay all the further proceedings by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2010

A. Balaram Reddy and ors. Vs. K.V. Narasimha Murthy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Section 10A; ;Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 14(1), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3) and 20; ;Gujarat Panchayat Act; ;Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Special Court (Officers and Employees) Service Rules - Rules 4, 10, 11, 15, 16 and 22; ;Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 10, 17, 19, and 37; ;Constitution of India - Articles 50, 226, 229, 235, 236, 311, 371D, 371D(3) and 371D(5)

Reported in : 2010(2)ALT818

Advocate for Respondent : J. Prabhakar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; V. Venkataramana, Adv. for Respondent No. 4 in W.P. No. 3089

ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. All these petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 06.02.2004 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A. No. 926...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2008

Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs, Kurnool Range-i Vs. Sri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-26-2008

Subject : CustomsCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 48, 391, 428, 446, 449, 455, 455(1), 456, 467, 468, 520, 529, 529, 530 and 530A; Customs Act - Sections 28B, 59, 61, 64, 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2) and 142; Workmen's Compensation Act; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Central Excise Act; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 11AAAA and 13(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 48; State Financial Corporation Act; Customs Rules

Reported in : AIR2009AP32; 2008(6)ALD209; 2009(6)ALT97; [2009]147CompCas172(AP); [2010]97SCL27(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : M. Anil Kumar, Official Liquidator for Respondent No. 1 and ;P.V. Markandeyulu, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In the event of a company being wound-up, in any of the three recognized modes, viz., by the Court, or voluntarily by a company itself, or subject to the supervision of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2015

Shri Prabhakar Reddy Vs. Mr. h.r. Ravichandra

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-20-2015

Subject : Arbitration

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI C.M.P.NO.152 OF2014C/W C.M.P. NO.151 OF2014C.M.P.NO.152 OF2014BETWEEN SHRI PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT65YEARS S/O LATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2008

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Shriram Refrigeration Industries [P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : May-02-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35E, 35G, 35G(1) and 35L; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129 and 130; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978

Reported in : 2009(240)ELT201(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Shivadas, Adv. for; M.S. Ramchandra Rao, Adv. in CEA and; A. Rajashekar Reddy, Assistant Solicitor General in CEAMP

ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. As common question of law arises in all these appeals, they respondent being disposed of by a common order.2. Shriram Refrigeration Industries Limited (SIL), which later changed its name as Shriram Industrial Enterprises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2007

B. Subba Reddy Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-06-2007

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17(3), 18, 18(2), 18(5) to 18(9), 19, 19(1), 19(3), 20, 22, 25, 25(1), 26 and 32; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1A), 111A, 163, 196, 237, 397, 398, 402, 403, 406, 408 and 529A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation ) Act, 1976; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1972; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72A; Sick Industries (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2); Minimum Wages Act - Sections 20(2); Minimum Wages Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Regulations - Regulations 27 to 33

Reported in : 2008(1)ALT113

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rajashekar Reddy, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;M. Lakshmi Kumari and ;P. Vikram, Advs. for ;C. Kodana Ram, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 6, ;V.V.S.N. Raju, Adv. for Re

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Sri B. Subba Reddy, represented by his General Power of Attorney Holder filed the present writ petition for writ of certiorari to quash the order of the first respondent-appellate authority for Industrial and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial