Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a radhakrishnan · Page 1 of about 18,516 results (0.737 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 11 1996

Jose thengumpillil Vs. Secretary, Peruvanthanam Service Co-operative B ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-11-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 104 - Order 21, Rule 58 and 58(3) - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1997Ker261

Advocate for Respondent : Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Adv. (Amicus curiae)

Ramakrishnan, J. 1. These two unnumbered appeals are posted before us on a reference made by Balasubramunyan, J. The question posed before the learned Single Judge and referred for decision is whether the orders challenged in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2009

Jayasree T. (Former Hsst of Zhs School) Vs. the Director of Higher Sec ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-08-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala Education Act, 1958 - Sections 36; Kerala Education Rules - Rule 51A and 51B

Reported in : 2009(2)KLJ538

Advocate for Respondent : O.V. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv.

Balakrishnan Nair, J.1. The writ petitioner is the appellant. The respondents were the respondents in the Writ Petition. The point that arises for decision in this appeal is whether a Higher Secondary School Teacher (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1991

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad284

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T.R. Mani, ;Sr. Adv., for M/s. T.M. Hariharan and ;P.R. Balasubramanian, Adv.

ORDER1. On 4-3-1988 the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 2000

State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the District Collector, Ramanathapuram Di ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-28-2000

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 9, 100 and 347-E; Constitution of India -- Articles 341, 342 and 366 (24); Constitution relating to Ayodhya Act, 1993 -- Article 143

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC425

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. Radhakrishnan, Adv.

ORDER1. Since suits, appeals were disposed of by a common judgment the present second appeals are being disposed of by the following common judgment. 2. In both the appeals the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Assistant Collector/Revenue...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2003

S. Veerakumar Vs. State Bank of India by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Pension Rules - Rule 8; State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules - Rules 2(2), 7, 8, 20 and 22; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 49; Border Security Border Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ138Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kanniah, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the payment of pension to the petitioner and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

Nirlex Spares Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 35

Reported in : 2008(124)ECC120; 2008(150)LC120(SC); 2008(222)ELT3(SC); JT2008(1)SC261; (2008)2MLJ70(SC); 2008(1)SCALE53; (2008)2SCC628; 2008AIRSCW582; 2008(4)KCCRSN305

Advocate for Respondent : K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., ; Arijit Prasad and ; B.K. Prasa

Tarun Chatterjee, J.1. The pivotal question that needs to be adjudicated upon in this appeal is whether the appellant company is entitled to exemption from payment of central excise duty under Notification No. 175/1986-CE dated 1st...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2004

Nandkishore Ganesh Joshi Vs. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Ka ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Mumbai Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 20, 21, 36, 73 and 451; Rule Book of the Corporation, General Meetings, standing Committee and Transport Committee Working Rules - Rule 24

Reported in : AIR2005SC34; I(2005)BC172; 2005(2)BomCR754; JT2004(9)SC242; 2004(8)SCALE850; (2004)11SCC417; 2005(1)LC196(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC144

Advocate for Respondent : K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., ; Sameer Parekh, ; Lalit Chauha

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTION :2. The Appellant herein, Chairman of the Standing Committee of the Second Respondent-Municipal Corporation of City of Kalyan and Dombivali (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') had filed a writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2003

M.P. Dhanaraj, Executive Engineer (O and M), Coimbatore Electricity Di ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)1MLJ773

Advocate for Respondent : V. Radhakrishnan, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanbhan, J.1. The petitioner, an Executive Engineer in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board initially prayed for the issue of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in his proceedings (permanent)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2009

Atul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Cochi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 6(3), 15, 16 and 19; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 124

Reported in : 2009(168)LC1(SC); 2009(7)LC3189(SC); 2009AIRSCW2072; 2009(5)SCC46; 2009(3)Scale242; 2009(4)JT23.

S.H. Kapadia, J.Civil Appeal No. 2999 of 2007:1. This civil appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7.4.2006 in Customs Appeal No. 15/05 delivered by the Division Bench of Kerala High Court by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2006

The Management of Ram Lal Anand College Vs. the Workman Sh. C.L. Yadav ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 11A, 17B, 21 and 22; Minimum Wages Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; University Non-academic Staff Employees Regulations - Regulation 70 and 70(8)

Reported in : 2006(87)DRJ731; 2006(3)SLJ251(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Yadav, Adv. for Respondent No.1 Party in person

S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. The writ petitioner in these proceedings challenges an order dated 21. 3. 1996 as well as the final award dated 4. 3. 1998, of the Industrial Tribunal-I. 2. The writ petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial