Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a rab · Page 1 of about 288 results (0.162 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 21 2010

Mahmud Ali. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-21-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 192; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323 , 379, 34

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Matloob Rab, Adv.

1. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 9.7.2003 passed by Sri Durgesh Mani Tripathi, Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2004

Kush Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Sep-01-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 364, 394 and 406

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1639

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rab, Addl. G.A.

J.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This is a criminal appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Code') against the judgment and order dated 8-9-1995 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar convicting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2005

Devi Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Sep-17-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304, 323 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1748

Advocate for Respondent : A. Rab, AGA, a/b.,; Rajeev Mohan and; M.C. Joshi, Ad

J.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This criminal appeal arises out against the judgment and order dated 21-7-1984 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Nainital in S. T. No. 180 of 1981 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 15 2010

Managing Director Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs. Kamal Nayan Naut ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Mar-15-2010

Subject : Service

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A. Rab

Nirmal Yadav, J.1. By means of present special appeal preferred by Managing Director Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Limited (herein after to be referred as 'Corporation) against the judgment and order dated 27th May 2004 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1960

Harish Chandra Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-01-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Sugar (Control) Order, 1955; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 5; Uttar Pradesh Khandsari Sugar Manufacturers Licensing Order, 1959

Reported in : AIR1960All650

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

ORDERJ.K. Tandon, J.1. The three petitioners are separately employed in the business, as cottage-industry, of manufacture of Khandsari sugar in the district of Bijnor. They have, as part of that industry, installed power-crushers also for extracting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2026

Aastha Electricals vs Union of India Ministry of Power & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Ms. Himanshi Singh, Mr. Mukul Singh, Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay Ms. Monika Sharma, Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey Mr. Ashish, Dr. Aman Rab, Mrs. Payal Bhatia

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8570/2023 Date of Decision: 19.03.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: AASTHA ELECTRICALS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asutosh Lohia, Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Ms. Mansi Rose Taneja, Ms. Rishika...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2023

Abdul Rab V vs the District Collector, Malappuram

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-03-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 25319 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 ABDUL RAB V., AGED 47 YEARS,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2026

Sunil Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-13-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Satish Kumar, Ms. Upasna Bakshi

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: February 05, 2026 % Pronounced on: February 13,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2023

Nasheeda vs the District Collector

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-15-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 24TH BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 30242 OF 2023 PETITIONER: NASHEEDA AGED 40 YEARS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 2026

Natonal Centre for Biological Sciences vs M/S Urc Constructions Privat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-18-2026

-1- TH RESERVED ON 16 APRIL 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial