Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a r naolekar · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.035 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 1969

Jaykumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Om Prakash and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-1969

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 16, 17, 30, 39 and 39(1); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74

Reported in : AIR1970MP119; 1969MPLJ931

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Naolekar, Adv. (for No. 1) and ;N.K. Patel, Adv. (for No. 2)

A.P. Sen, J.1. This Is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decision of the IV Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, dated 16th February 1968, arising out of proceedings instituted by them under Section 30 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1974

Ashok Vs. Narasingh Rao and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-03-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1975MP39

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naolekar, Adv.

ORDERShiv Dayal, J.1. The plaintiff is aggrieved by an order of the trial Court whereby it has been held that the plaintiff must pay proper ad valorem court-fees.2. Earlier a suit for ejectment and arrears of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1957

Udebhan Rajaram Vs. Vikram Ganu

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-29-1957

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1957MP175

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Naolekar, Adv.

Chaturvedi, J.1. Vikram and Lahanu were real brothers, residing separately. Lahanu died, leaving his daughter Mst. Radha, who came in possession of Khasra No. 13/1, area 1.94 acres of mouza Khedi Pandewar, Tahsil Sausar, District Chhindwara....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 1967

Shitaldas, Partner, Damodardas Shitaldas Vs. State Transport Appellate ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-24-1967

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 48 and 64; Central Provinces and Berar Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 73A

Reported in : AIR1967MP255

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Dube, Govt. Adv. and ;P.R. Naolekar, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

Bhave, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari for quashing the order, dated 10th June, 1965, passed by the State Transport Appellate Authority Madhya Pradesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial