Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a r naokar · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.021 seconds)

Jan 04 1974

Ranvir Singh Vs. State of M.P. Through Collector, Vidisha and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayats Act, 1962 - Sections 24, 26 and 31; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR1974MP121; 1974MPLJ197

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Tandon, Dy. G.A. and ;H.G. Mishra, Adv. for Opposite Parties Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to 6

Dwivedi, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India.2. The petitioner's case is this. The petitioner is the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Phufer, Pargana Basoda, District Vidisha, since 1970. This...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1973

Pritam Das Vs. Mst. Akbari and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-1973

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 98 and 98(3)

Reported in : AIR1973MP224; 1973MPLJ830

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Inamdar, Adv.

Bhave, J.1. On a difference between Honourable Justice Shiv Dayal and Honourable Justice S.B. Sen, the following question has been referred to me for my decision:--'Whether the agreements (Exs. D-1 and D-2). relied on by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1972

Gyasiram Kanairam Vaish Vs. Brij Bhushandas and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-1972

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1973MP148; 1973MPLJ201

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, ;J.R. Sharma, ;N.K. Jain and ;V.G. Vishwaroop, Advs.

Shivdayal, J.1. This appeal arises from proceedings under Order 21, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, in the following circumstances.2. (a) In 1908, Rajabai executed a mortgage with possession in favour of Narayandas for Rs. 9,660/- in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jan 19 1962

Ganpati Chintaman Vs. Shiv Ram Damodar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-19-1962

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1963MP209

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. Patankar and ;A.R. Naokar, Advs.

ORDERP.R. Sharma, J.1. This revision application is directed against the order passed on 6-6-1961 by the Addl. District Judge Gwalior in Civil Appeal No. 19 of 1961 whereby he set aside the order dated the 27th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1975

Balubhai Hirji Gajjar and ors. Vs. Sureshkumar Nathuram and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-1975

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B

Reported in : AIR1977MP58; 1977MPLJ279

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, Adv.

Dwivedi, J.1. These two appeals Misc. First Appeal No. 48/67, (Balubhai v. Smt. Sarjubai) and Misc. First Appeal No. 103/67, (Smt. Sarjubai v. Balabhai) arise out of the award dated 2-5-1967 of the Motor Accidents Claims...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1977

Omprakash Vs. Ramcharan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-07-1977

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 12(1) and 12(6)

Reported in : AIR1978MP52

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, C.J.1. This case has come up before us on reference by the learned single Judge on the question whether compensation is payable to the tenant under Sub-section (6) of Section 12 of the M....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1972

Gyasiram Kaniram Vaish Vs. Brij Bhushandas

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-1972

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1973MP155; 1973MPLJ211

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, ;J.R. Sharma, ;N.K. Jain and ;V.G. Vishwaroop, Advs.

Shivdayal, J.1. This appeal arises from proceedings under Order 21, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the following circumstances.2. (a) In 1908, Rajabai executed a mortgage with possession in favour of Narayandas for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1976

Ramgopal Kanhaiyalal Vs. Chetu Batte

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-1976

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 250 and 257; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1976MP160

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, C.J.1. The questions referred to this Full Bench are whether the Civil Court cannot take cognizance of a suit instituted by Bhumiswami on the basis of his title, against a trespasser; and whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1976

Shakoor Khan and ors. Vs. Ram Mohan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-29-1976

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1977MP187; 1977MPLJ795

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, Adv.

C.M. Lodha, J.1. A preliminary objection has been raised by the counsel for the respondents that the whole appeal has abated on account of the failure on the part of the appellants to bring on record...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1975

Ramhet and anr. Vs. Mandir Shri LaxminaraIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-27-1975

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 168(2) and 168(4)

Reported in : AIR1976MP216

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Naokar, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, J.1. At the instance of Mandir Shri Laxminarain, respondent No. 1 (hereinafter called the respondent-Mandir), proceeding started on July 27, 1964, in the court of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sabalgarh, district Morena, under Section 168(4)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.