Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a r khan · Page 1 of about 308 results (0.215 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 21 2014

Akhil Bhartiya Dhamma Sena and Another Vs. Union of India, Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Z.A. Haq, J. 1. Heard Mr. J.M. Shamkuwar with Mr. M.A. Khobragade, Advocates for the petitioners, Mr. S.V. Manohar, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.P. Kariya, Advocate for respondent no.3 and Mrs. B.H. Dangre, officiating Government Pleader...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2000

Balwant Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2000

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1; 2000(55)DRJ22

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhasin and ; Mr. Neeraj Kaul, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. There are canteens in Parliament House and Parliament House Annexe and petitioners are working in these canteens. They are the employees of these canteens on casual basis which are being run by Canteen...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1998

Smt. Sughra Begum Vs. Additional District Judge Xiith, Lucknow and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-20-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 16, 23 and 23(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order I, Rule 10 - Order XXII

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1935

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C., ;A.R. Khan and ;Sandeep Dixit, Advs.

R.H. Zaidi, J.1. After considering the arguments made by the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the record of the case thoroughly, the writ petition was partly allowed and operative portion of the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 10 1990

Sahib Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-10-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ687

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Usha Kumar and ; Ms. Vandana Sagar, Advs.; H.R. Khan

ORDER1. Sahib Singh, petitioner, was challenged to face trial for committing the offences punishable under S. 302, IPC and S. 27 of the Arms Act for causing the death of one Mukesh by stabbing on 27-7-88....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2013

Suresh S/O Shivram Naiknaware and Others Vs. the Joint Charity Commiss ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Sep-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. This writ petition takes exception to the order passed by the In-charge Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur dated 13th June, 2011. 3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2004

Sarad Kumar Srivastava and ors. Vs. High Court of Judicature at Allaha ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-17-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Civil Court Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rule 14(3)

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC246

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Sirohi, S.C.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Kant senior counsel assisted by Manoj Kumar Pandey, Sri R.S. Misra, assisted by Sri Arun Kumar, Sri B.D. Mandhyan, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Satish Mandhyan, and Sri L.R. Khan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2013

Indian Nval Canteen Service Employees Un Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201321ST BHADRA, 1935 WP(C).No. 32100 of 2011 (J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. INDIAN NAVAL CANTEEN SERVICE EMPLOYEES' UNION (REG.NO.07-62...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2002

Mridul Saikia @ Babu Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-26-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376

Advocate for Respondent : N. Mahammad, PP

I.A. Ansari, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order, dated 31.12.2001, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jorhat, in Sessions Case No. 36 (J.J.) of 2000, convicting the accused-appellant under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2008

Mr. Gulam Mohd. Kabir Mohd. Mir @ Gulmir and Mohd. Nazir Mohd. Mehbood ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 8C, 20, 28 and 167(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 156, 156(3), 161(1), 167, 167(2), 170, 180, 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 204, 207 to 209, 309 and 309(2)

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2426

Advocate for Respondent : K.V. Saste, A.P.P.

V.C. Daga, J. 1. The short issue involved in this Criminal Application for bail is as under:Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants/ accused are entitled for bail under Section 167(2) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2001

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Umesh Korga Bhandari and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 309; Department Canteen Employees Rules, 1980

Reported in : [2001(90)FLR713]; (2001)IILLJ157Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Buch, Adv.

1. All these three appeals can be disposed of by this common Judgment since the point involved is the same. In addition, Writ Petitions, out of which these L.P.As. arise, were disposed of by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial