Advanced Search Results
Narayan Vs. Ningappa and anr.
Karnataka
Apr-13-1981
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3
AIR1982Kant159; ILR1982KAR439
Annadanayya Puranik, Adv.
ORDER1. In view of the further arguments addressed by both the sides before signing the order dated 2-4-1981 is recalled and the following order is passed.The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJammada Aivappa Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Karnataka
Jun-11-1979
Constitution
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6 and 6(1-A)
AIR1980Kant22
Annadanayya Puranik, Govt. Adv.
ORDER1. In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner who is the owner of the lands bearing S Nos. 71/5, 71/4 and 73/7 of Kaikere village, Virajpet Taluk, has challenged the validity of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeoples Education Society, Belgaum Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Jul-12-1979
Trusts and Societies
Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 - Sections 27-A
AIR1980Kant151; 1979(2)KarLJ343
Annadanayya Puranik, Govt. Pleader
ORDER1. In this petition under Article 226(1)(a) (b) and (c) of the Constitution, the petitioner-Society has challenged the validity of the order passed by the State Government in No. RD 48 EST. 79 dated 19th April....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Mr. Avinash D. Kambl ...
Mumbai
Mar-03-2008
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 7, 21(2), 27 and 42; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Contract Act - Sections 23; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(18), 35, 35(5), 40 and 78; Bombay Electricity (Special Powers) Act, 1946; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act; Constitution of India - Article 14, 16, 21, 39, 112(3) and 202(3); Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 33(6) and 35
2008(3)ALLMR1; 2008(2)BomCR497; (2008)110BOMLR805; 2008(4)MhLj125; 1996(72)FLR166
S.D. Thakur, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;T.R. Kankale, Adv. and ;A.M. Deshpande, AGPs for Respondent No. 2
R.C. Chavan, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 29-4-2005 rendered by a learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellant-employer and partially allowing the petitions by the respondent-employees, the employer has preferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.S. Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. Central India Spinning, Weaving and Ma ...
Mumbai
Nov-06-2006
Labour and Industrial
Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 2, 2(15), 3(1), 3(2), 3(30), 3(38), 11, 12, 12(31), 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 19(2), 23, 23(1), 23B, 27A, 28(1), 30, 32, 33, 33A, 42, 42(2), 42(4), 44, 50A, 58, 71, 72, 73(1), 73(2), 73(3), 73A, 76, 79(1), 80 and 83A; Bar Councils Act - Sections 8, 14 and 14(1); Bombay Shops Establishment Act; Trade Union Act, 1926; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947; Bombay Industrial Relations (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1964; Legal Practitioners' Act - Sections 4; Bombay Industrial Relations Rules - Rules 37 and 40; Insolvency Rules - Rule 128; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 17, Rule 2; The Bombay Industrial Relation Rules, 1947 - Rules 10 and 11; Consitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)
2007(1)ALLMR601; 2007(2)BomCR147
R.B. Puranik, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Petitioners before this Court have challenged the order passed by Member, Industrial Court dated 16th Oct. 1995 below exhibit 28 in Reference (ICN) 4/1978, holding that the Petitioners have no legal right or...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShrinivas Kenheri Kulkarni Vs. Subbappa Mehetru Nidagalkar and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-25-1976
Civil
Karnataka Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 7(2) and 26
AIR1977Kant78; ILR1976KAR1755; 1976(2)KarLJ202
B.V. Heddur Shetty and ;Annedenayya Puranik, Advs.
Venkataswami, J.1. This appeal under Section 43(1) of the Code, of Civil Procedure is by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 24/73 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge, Belgaum. He is aggrieved by an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrafulla Son of Vinodji Gudadhe Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through t ...
Mumbai
Jul-24-2009
Civil
Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 2; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 6, 20(1E), 20(1E)(1), 40A(2), 407 and 407(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 19(1AA); Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 3, 3(4) and 10; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Regulations
2009(111)BomLR3593; 2009(6)MhLj695
B.H. Dangre, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5, ;S.M. Puranik, Adv. for Respondent No. 3, ;S.K.I. Mishra, Adv. for Respondent No. 4 and ;A.M. Gordey and ;A.M. Ghare, Advs. for Respond
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The Writ Petition is to be decided finally at admission stage, and accordingly it appears that the same was being fixed at 2-30 p.m., by earlier Benches. It also appears that it was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra and Mahindra Employees' Union and Ors. Vs. Commissioner of La ...
Mumbai
Dec-07-2006
Labour and Industrial
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 28, 28A, 28(3), 28(4) and 34(6); Bombay Industrial Relations Rules, 1947 - Rules 41, 43, 43(1), 43(2), 243(1) and 243(2)
(2007)IILLJ858Bom
Y.B. Mandpe, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;R.B. Puranik, Adv. for Respondent No. 5 and ;A.M. Gordey and ;M.V. Mohokar, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 6 to 8
D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of Shri Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Mandpe, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Shri Puranik, learned Counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhadra Bai Vs. State of Mysore
Karnataka
Mar-15-1972
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 34
AIR1973Kant13; AIR1973Mys13; (1973)1MysLJ175
Anna Danayya Puranik, High Court Government Pleader
1. On account of construction of a tank at Hosalli village, Koppal taluk, certain land belonging to the appellant-claimant became submerged under water in the year 1959-60. Later on preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph D'Souza Vs. the State of Mysore and Ors.
Karnataka
Oct-29-1971
Tenancy
Mysore Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 21, 21(1), 48 and 50
AIR1972Kant261; AIR1972Mys261; 1974CriLJ212; ILR1973KAR517; (1973)1MysLJ397
Annadanayya Puranik, High Court Govt. Pleader
ORDERK. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This is a revision petition under Section 50 of the Mysore Rent Control Act. 1961, shortly called the Act, preferred by the landlord against the order made by the First Addl. District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »