Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a p sircar and · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 1996

Dr. Amal Kumar Samanta and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-04-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; ;Burdwan University Act, 1981 - Section 2(21) and 2(22)

Reported in : (1996)2CALLT494(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Sircar, ;S. Srimani and ;A. Chaterjee, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4

Altamas Kabir, J.1. The short point involved in this case is whether the petitioners, who are working either as Technical Assistants, Technical Supervisors or Herbarium Assistants in the University of Burdwan, can be classified as 'Teaching...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1989

Krishna Pada Ghose Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-21-1989

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Bengal Rural Primary Education Act, 1930; ;Bengal Rural Primary Education Rules, 1930 - Rule 2

Reported in : (1989)2CALLT278(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Mukherjee and ;A.P. Sircar, Advs.

Susanta Chatterji, J.1. C.R. No. 2821-26(W)/81 are taken along with C.R. No. 417-21 (W)/79.2. Similar points are involved in all the cases. By referring the writ petitioners filed by the respective parties it appears that they...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1994

Haradhan Mitra Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-30-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16(2)

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ550Cal

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Sircar and ;Subir Sanyal, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and ;Gobinda Bhattacharya, Adv.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Although, the question involved in this writ application relating to appointment on compassionate grounds had been considered even very recently both by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the various High Courts, it is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 05 1996

The Chairman, Khardah Municipality and anr. Vs. Annapurna Bakery and a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-05-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 - Sections 19, 118, 119, 120 and 123; ;Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 202 and 203; ;Air (Prevention and Control of Polution) Act, 1974; ;West Bengal Fire Services Act

Reported in : (1997)1CALLT32(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Sircar and ;Debjani Sengupta, Advs.

Satyabrata Sinha, J. 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 26.9.95 passed by N.K. Batabyal, J. in C.O. No. 19502(W)/95 whereby and whereunder the said learned Court allowed the Writ application filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1994

Mausumi Nandi Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-05-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226

Reported in : (1995)1CALLT198(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Soumitra Sen, Adv. ;A.P. Sircar, Adv.

Satyabrata Sinha, J.1. The prayers of the petitioner inter alia in this application, are :(A). A writ of or in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding the respondents and their servants, subordinate and agents to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2000

Chandra Kanti Bag and ors. Vs. Chandidas Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-14-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226;; West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rule, 1989 - Rule 103;; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 69, 69(1), 80, 80(3), 81, 81(4)

Reported in : II(2000)ACC508,(2000)2CALLT427(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Amal Sen, Adv.

1. In terms or the order dated 14th October, 1999, both the application for stay as also the appeal are taken up for hearing together. It may be indicated that this appeal was preferred pursuant to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1988

Amco Traders Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Board and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-11-1988

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 64;; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1990Cal18

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Deb, ;L.K. Poddar, ;A.P. Sarcar and ;D. Bera, Advs.

ORDERBimal Chandra Basak, J. 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dt. 15th Jan., 1986 whereby the learned trial Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant herein and discharged the Rule....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1995

Durgapur Projects Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-17-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 15(2)

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ1256Cal

Advocate for Respondent : Manik Ch. Das, ;Madhusudan Dutta and ;Subrato Banerjee, Advs.

A.K. Chakraborty, J. 1. The short point involved in this writ application is whether the learned 7th Industrial Tribunal by order No. 13 dated March 29, 1995 was justified in granting interim relief under Section 15(2)(b)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1993

Smt. Arati Pal with Sri Nirmal Kumar Tekriwal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-18-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Section 177, 177(1) and 177(3); ;Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Section 402; ;Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (1994)1CALLT466(HC)

Altamas Kabir, J.1. These two matters are taken up for disposal together as they involve common questions of law and fact which are more or less similar.2. In both these two matters, notices isssued by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1989

The Ganges Manufacturing Company Limited and anr. Vs. State of West Be ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-20-1989

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Sections 138, 147, 147(3), 148 and 149; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1990)1CALLT210(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Kumar Roy, Adv. and ;Naranarayan Gooptu, Adv.-General

Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present Rule was issued at the instance of the petitioner No. 1, the Ganges Manufacturing Company Limited, a public Limited Company and the petitioner No. 2 being its General Manager challenging the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial