Advanced Search Results
L.S. Bisht Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
May-18-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
77(1999)DLT211
B.P. Aggarwal, Adv.
ORDERS (.) CHARGE ASSUMPTION REPORT BE SENTTO ALL CONCERNED IMMEDIATELY.4. On 23.3.1995, the Additional Deputy Director (Personnel) wrote to the Deputy Director (Accounts) Pay and Accounts Division in the following terms :Sub: Promotion of Commandant (SC)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaulat Ram Vs. Bharat Insurance Company and anr.
Delhi
May-04-1972
Insurance
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 138; Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45
AIR1973Delhi180; [1974]44CompCas190(Delhi)
J. P. Aggarwal and ; S.P. Aggarwal, Advs.
1. The plaintiff (Daulat Ram) is the appellant. He filed a suit for recovery of Rs.10,000/- on the insurance policy which has been taken by Smt. Chawli Devi being her adopted son he was the nominee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskToriyli Alias Jabbar Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Sep-04-1992
Criminal
1993CriLJ2496; 1992(24)DRJ90
B.P. Aggarwal and ; Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advs.
ORDER1. toriyli alias Jabbar, the petitioner herein was detained in pursuance to an order passed on 6th November, 1991 under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Electronic Enterprises Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Sep-17-1999
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
1999VIAD(Delhi)777; AIR2000Delhi55; 83(2000)DLT47; 1999(51)DRJ485
Mr. B.P. Aggarwal, Adv.
ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The facts which has led the parties into this litigation are that on 11.4.1989 the Tender of the petitioner in respect of supply of Multimeters together with its 'Carrying Cases' was accepted by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYogesh Kant Bhageria Vs. Deepak Jain
Delhi
Sep-16-1999
Commercial
Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 2; Banking Regulation Act, 1949
1999VAD(Delhi)860; AIR2000Delhi42; 82(1999)DLT269; 1999(51)DRJ336; (2000)124PLR40
Mr. A.P. Aggarwal, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 7th August, 1998 passed by the Court of Shri J.M. Malik, Additional District Judge, Delhi granting a decree in favor of the respondent/plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chinar Goods Carriers (Regd.) and ors ...
Delhi
Aug-07-1998
Civil
Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34
AIR1998Delhi394; 1998(47)DRJ557
B.P. Aggarwal, Adv. for Respondent 1 and ; Jasmeet Singh, Adv. for Respondent 3
ORDERK.S. Gupta, J. 1. Plaintiff filed suit, inter alia, alleging that it is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1913 having its registered office at Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort, Bombay and one of the branch...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEquipment and Conductors (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Jul-27-1999
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33
2000(52)DRJ266
B.P. Aggarwal, Adv.
Vikrmajeet Singh, J.1. Mr B.P. Aggarwal learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that there was no evidence before the learned Arbitrator which would justified his awarding a sum of Rs 1,01,180.40. It is however...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiksha Trading Co. Vs. General Manager (North Zone), Bank of Baroda an ...
Delhi
Sep-25-2007
Banking
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Sections 13(2)
IV(2007)BC466
R.P. Aggarwal, Adv.
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. Issue notice. Mr. R.P. Aggarwal, Advocate accepts notice. With consent of Counsel for the parties the matter was heard for final disposal.2. The petitioner seeks a mandatory order to the respondent Bank...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLala Om Prakash Son of Late Lala Mithan Lal Vs. Hari Ram Son of Late L ...
Delhi
Nov-29-2004
FamilyProperty
Registration Act - Sections 17(2); Limitation Act - Sections 2 - Schedule - Article 113
AIR2005Delhi190; 116(2005)DLT71; 2005(79)DRJ453
S.P. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. and ; Sandeep Aggarwal, Adv.
Vijender Jain, J.1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge dated 25th April, 2003, inter alia, holding that there was no oral partition of the suit property and the respondent was not estopped...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another
Chennai
Aug-23-2016
Land Acquisition
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), South...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »