Advanced Search Results
Tamil Nadu Government Officials' Union, Manaparai Taluk, Represented b ...
Chennai
Jan-31-1985
Labour and Industrial
(1986)ILLJ262Mad
ORDER1. In this writ petition at the instance of the Tamil Nadu Government Officials Union, Manaparai Taluk, Tiruchy District, represented by its Secretary, the petitioner-Union has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Radhika Rao Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-15-1991
Constitution
Karnataka Medical Colleges (Selection of Candidates for Admission to I M.B.B.S.) Rules - Rules 4(1) and 9
ILR1992KAR1973; 1991(3)KarLJ95
N.B.N. Swamy, HCGP
ORDERShivaprakash, J. 1. This petition is taken up for final hearing at the preliminary hearing stage as it relates to the admission of a student to a professional course.2. This petition is presented by a girl...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKintali China Jaganadham and ors. Vs. K. Laxmi Naidu and ors.
Orissa
Aug-03-1987
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92
AIR1988Ori100; 64(1987)CLT493
B. Raghava Rao, ;B.L.N. Swamy and ;N.K. Das, Advs.
ORDERR.C. Patnaik, J.1. Grant of leave to the opposite parties 1 to 3, the plaintiffs, by the Court under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure during the pendency of a suit has given rise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mgt. of Orissa Road Transport Company Ltd. Vs. M. Venkata Rao and anr.
Orissa
Feb-06-1992
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A and 33(2)
74(1992)CLT272; (1993)ILLJ468Ori
V.S.N. Murthy, Adv. in O.J.C. 2097/89 and ;B.L.N. Swamy, Adv. in O.J.C. 2938/88
G.B. Patnaik, J.1. Both these writ applications are against the same award of the Industrial Tribunal, the former being by the Management and the latter being by the employee. The Management assails the award and claims...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Kumar Patra Vs. Dhirendra Kumar Patra and ors.
Orissa
Apr-21-1993
Property
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6 and 8; Benami Transactions Act, 1988
1993(II)OLR115
B.L.N. Swamy and B.V. Balaram Das (for opp. party No. 1) and ;Addl. Government Adv. (for opp. party Nos. 2 to 4)
A. Pasayat, J.1. Detailed reference to the factual aspects is not necessary because the fate of this writ application depends primarily upon adjudication of questions of law.2. Bare facts necessary are as follows :Petitioner and Dhirendra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrajabandhu Sahu and ors. Vs. Krupasindhu Sahu and ors.
Orissa
Jun-18-1991
Family
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227; Hindu Law
1991(II)OLR121
Addl. Standing Counsel for O. Ps. 2 to 5, B.L.N. Swamy, B.V.S. Das and R.K. Rath for O.P. No. 1
B.N. Dash, J.1. This writ application under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution is for quashing Annexure-3 whereby the Commissioner of Consolidation has directed to record the disputed lands measuring Ac. 1. 88 1/2 decimals...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGatikrishna Mohanty and anr. Vs. Board of Secondary Education and anr.
Orissa
Jul-23-1984
Constitution
Board of Secondary Education Regulations - Regulation 6 and 34B - Sections I
1984(II)OLR1013
B.L.N. Swamy, Adv.
G.B. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 was a regular student in the Government High School in Unit No. 1, Bhubaneswar, and was prosecuting his study upto Class-X. He was duly sent up by the Headmaster for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHimansu Parida Vs. District Judge and anr.
Orissa
Jul-29-1996
Service
Orissa Districts and Subordinate Courts Ministerial Services (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Services) Rules, 1969 - Rule 6(5)
82(1996)CLT585; 1996(II)OLR372
B.L.N. Swamy, Govt. Adv.
Dipak Misra, J. 1. Inaction of the opp. parties in not issuing the order of appointment for the post of Typist in spite of three vacancies in contravention of Sub-rule (5) of Rule 6 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAinthu Charan Parida Vs. Sitaram Jayanarayan Firm and anr.
Orissa
Aug-10-1984
CivilLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 115 - Order 43, Rule 1; Limitation Act - Sections 5
AIR1984Ori230; 58(1984)CLT243; 1984(I)OLR819
B.R. Rao, ;B.L.N. Swamy and ;N.R. Agarwalla, Advs.
Behera, J. 1. In this revision directed against the order passed by the additional District Judge, Keonjhar, refusing to condone the delay in preferring a Money Appeal presented under Order 41, Rule 1 of the Code...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. the Joint Chief Controller of Imports
Mumbai
Feb-26-1969
Intellectual Property Rights
(1974)76BOMLR26
Nathwani, J.1. [His Lordship after dealing with points not material to this report, proceeded.] Against the background of woollen industry and the relevant rules which governed the grant of actual users' licences before the impugned new...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »