Advanced Search Results

M/S. Samta Construction Vs. Pawan Kumar Sharma and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(MP)405

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Abhay Sapre

ORDERDIPAK MISRA, J.:Justifiability of the action of the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) and Commissioner of Income Tax there respondents Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, herein, requisitioning the bank draft of the petitioner in exercise...

Rajasthan State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Rajesh Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ServiceElectricity

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC58; 1992WLN(UC)342

K.C. Agrawal, C.J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the Rajasthan State Electricity Board (for short 'Board') against the judgment of a learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition directing the Board to constitute an appropriate...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gulam Rasool and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147, 148 and 263

Reported in : [1997]225ITR904(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Purohit, Adv.

A.K. Mathur, C.J.1. All the aforesaid reference cases involve common questions of law and facts and, therefore, they are disposed of by this common judgment.2. For convenient disposal of all the aforesaid references, the facts given...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Vikas Nigam Ltd ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1), 80AA and 80M

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(MP)423; [2005]274ITR625(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Purohit, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. The present appeal preferred Under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was admitted on the following question of law :'Whether the Tribunal was justified in its...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 961 - Sections 69A

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(MP)419; [2003]263ITR610(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Purohit, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity 'the Act'), the Revenue has assailed the order passed by the Tribunal in I. T. A. No. 269/JAB...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Associated Food Products P. Ltd. and Po ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 129, 132, 133A, 142(1), 143(1), 154, 158BC, 263, 263(1) and 271(1)

Reported in : (2006)202CTR(MP)192; [2006]280ITR377(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Purohit, Adv.

1. These two appeals were admitted on the following substantial question of law :Whether, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in overturning and unsettling the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax passed under Section 263 of...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Motilal Subhodh Kumar Jain

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 51, 260A, 269SS, 269T, 269T(1) and 271E; Finance Act, 1985; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(MP)58; [2005]277ITR524(MP); 2004(3)MPLJ304

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Purohit, Adv.

Arun Mishra, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the CIT, Jabalpur, under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), aggrieved by an order passed by the Tribunal, Jabalpur,...

Cit Vs. Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Vikas Nigam Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]140TAXMAN388(MP)

ORDERDipak Misra, J. The present appeal preferred tinder section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was admitted on the following question of law:-'Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was...

Mangesh Janardhan Mohite (President) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 16, 41, 42, 76, 95B and 184; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 33(7); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sameer Tendulkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 1288/2001 and in C. S. No. 171/2001 in W.P. No. 1288/2001, for respondent Nos. 13 to 15, ;P. Janardhanan, A.G. and R.M. Sawant, G.P.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions raise important questions of law with respect to some of the provisions of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'MHAD Act') concerning development of acquired...

S. Purushotham and 4 ors. Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Chief Secr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : States Reorganization Act 1956 - Sections 115(7); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226 and 309; General Administration (Services-B) Rule, 1998 - Rules 2 and 3; Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Service Rules; Punjab Medical College Education Service (Class-I) Rules, 1978 - Rule 9

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD642

Advocate for Respondent : M. Surender Rao, Special Government Pleader

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, in O.A.Nos. 5698 and 5904 of 1999 dated 14.02.2000, W.P. Nos. 16842 of 2000 and 8551 of 2001 are filed by the Section Officers of...