Advanced Search Results

P.K. Pradhan Vs. the State of Sikkim Represented by the Central Bureau ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 197; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120-B, 161 and 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sedctions 5(1) and (2), 6 and 197; Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 19

Reported in : AIR2001SC2547; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)332; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)175; (2001)3CALLT68(SC); 2001CriLJ3505; 2001(3)Crimes323(SC); JT2001(5)SC610; RLW2002(1)SC27; 2001(4)SCALE508; (2001)6SCC7; 2001 (6) SCC 704

B.N. Agrawal. J.1. In this appeal by Special Leave, order passed by Sikkim High Court. in Criminal Revision Application dismissing the same after holding that no sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...

Delhi Judicial Services Assn. and ors. Vs. Delhi High Court and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14, 16(1), 32, 233 and 309; Delhi Higher Judicial Services Rules - Rules 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16 and 17

Reported in : AIR2001SC2102; 2001(4)ALT27(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC202; 2001LabIC1743; 2001(3)SCALE737; (2001)5SCC145; [2001]3SCR314; 2001(2)SCT1050(SC); 2001(3)SLJ206(SC); 2001(2)LC826(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Kashyap, ; A. Mariarputham, ; B.K. Pal (N.P.), ;

1. Pattanaik, J.1. The unending dispute between the promotees and direct recruits in Delhi Superior Judicial Service has reached the third round in these two writ petitions and we hope and trust that this will be...

A. Mahudeswaran and ors. Vs. Govt. of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 10 and 23

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)63; [1996(73)FLR1669]; JT1996(5)SC506; 1996(3)SCALE289; (1996)8SCC617; [1996]3SCR312

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariarputham, ; Aruna Mathur and ; Ambrish Kumar, Advs.

ORDER1. Delay condoned2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. Leave granted.4. The facts are not in dispute. Consequent upon the abolition of the post of the Village Officer in the year 1982, around 2000...

K.D. Dewan Vs. Harbhajan S. Parihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2 and 13(3); Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 11(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)307; AIR2002SC67; 2002(1)ALD28(SC); [2002(1)JCR298(SC)]; JT2001(9)SC327; (2002)2PLR682; 2001(7)SCALE598; (2002)1SCC119

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariarputham, ; Maninder Singh, ; Mrs. Aruna Mathur, ;

ORDER1. This appeal, by special leave, is from he judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C.R.No.3791 of 1998 dated April 6, 1999. 2. The appellant is the tenant of Suit...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Tapas D. Neogy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13 and 16; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 13, 14, 120-B, 467, 468, 471 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 18, 22, 102, 357, 451, 452, 453, 456 and 457

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD(Cri)731; [1999]98CompCas626(SC); 1999CriLJ4305; 1999(3)CTC350; JT1999(7)SC92; 1999(5)SCALE613; (1999)7SCC685; [1999]Supp2SCR609; 2000(1)LC431(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariarputham, Adv., ; Aruna Mathur, Adv. for ; Maninder Sin

ORDERG.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.4.97 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application No. 826 of 1996. The said criminal application along...

Padam Prasad Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 191 (1) (d), 226; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Representation of People Act, 1951; Registration of Electors Rules, 1960; Citizenship Rules, 1956 - Rule 2 of Schedule III

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Girish Pande; Mr. Ravinder Agarwal; Mr. P.R. Chopra; Mr. A. Mariarputham; Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the order? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDERIntroduction1. Stating that he...

K. Karuppannan Vs. the Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1962 - Rules 202 and 203; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Marketing Subordinate Service Rules(Special Rules) - Rules 2, 7 and 10; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1959; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 2; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : AIR1999SC2122; [1999(82)FLR490]; JT1999(5)SC187; (1999)IILLJ508SC; 1999(3)SCALE105; (1999)4SCC751; [1999]2SCR998

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariarputham and ; Aruna Mathur, Advs. for ; Arputham,

S.S. Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. In this appeal the order of Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras in O.A.No. 2605 dated 11-1-1995, is under challenge. The third respondent in the said O.A. is the appellant.2. To appreciate...

Dlf Universal Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Director General [investigation an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 3(3), 11, 13A, 13B, 36A and 55; Companies Act, 1956; Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Arbitration Act, 1940; Transfer of Property Act; Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 20A; Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Rules, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : AIR2008SC2244; III(2008)CPJ26(SC); 2008(8)SCALE342; [2008]84SCL426(SC); 2008AIRSCW3985; AIR2008SC2244; 2008(7)SCC513

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariarputham, ; Aruna Mathur and ; B.K. Prasad, Advs. f

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. M/s DLF Universal Limited (first appellant herein) and DLF Qutab Enclave Complex Educational Education Charitable Trust (second appellant herein) have filed this appeal under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade...

Sudhir Shantilal Mehta Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 2(34); Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45L; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 6(1), 21, 35A and 36(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(29); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 32; Contract Act; Parliamentary Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 43, 120A, 120B, 405 and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 6; Constitution of India - Articles 13 and 366(10)

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC554; 2009(11)SCALE217; (2009)8SCC1; [2009]96SCL403(SC); 2009AIRSCW5709; [2009] 12 SCR 682

Advocate for Respondent : A. Mariarputham, ; A. Subba Rao, ; Aruna Mathur, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION1. These appeals arise out of a judgment and order dated 9.6.2005 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Bombay constituted under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act,...

Asgar Ali Vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 6928 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 3786 of 2016) Vinod Kumar Bhagat and Ors .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Jammu...