Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a mandgi · Page 1 of about 126 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 2005

Sreenivas Lad Vs. Ekanath and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-22-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2005Kant405; 2005(6)KarLJ62

Advocate for Respondent : Anant Mandgi, Adv. for Respondents-1, 2, 7 and 11 to 19

Anand Byrareddy, J.1. This is a plaintiffs appeal against the dismissal of his application tinder Order 40, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC' for brevity).2. The facts are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1995

Jayathirth Ramacharya Gudi Vs. Bindumadhavacharaya Srinivasacharaya Gu ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-08-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7

Reported in : ILR1996KAR941; 1996(1)KarLJ124

Advocate for Respondent : Ananth Mandgi, Adv.

Hari Nath Tilhari, J. 1. This is a Revision under Section 115 of the C.P.C. from the Judgment and order dated 27.1.95 passed by the Civil Judge, Haveri in Misc. Appeal No. 21/94 (Jayathirth Ramacharya Gudi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1982

Adishayya Kadayya Kadadevaru and anr. Vs. Dundayya Gurushiddayya Hirem ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-22-1982

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 22, 22A, 72(4), 79, 79(1) and 80; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 107

Reported in : AIR1983Kant79; 1982(1)KarLJ402

Advocate for Respondent : N.A. Mandagi, Adv.

Sabhahit, J. 1. This appeal under Section 72(4) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') is by Trustees and is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-4-1978, passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 10 1987

Huvappa Mahadev Mense Vs. Land Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-10-1987

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 8, 45, 45A, 108 and 142; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87A and 88; Mysore Act, 1957 - Sections 5

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2797; 1987(2)KarLJ327

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Jagannath, Adv. Govt. Adv. for R-1 and R.U. Goulay, Adv. for R-3

Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. These appeals are by Huvappa, the petitioner, in W.P. Nos. 6517 and 7971 of 1977. He claimed the status of a tenant entitled to registration as an occupant under Section 45 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1954

Girdharlal Popatlal Shah and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-1954

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Press (Objectionable Matter) Act, 1951 - Sections 3, 11 and 24

Reported in : AIR1956Bom32; (1955)57BOMLR952; 1956CriLJ206; ILR1955Bom932

Advocate for Respondent : H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader and ;A.M. Mandgi, Asst. Govt. Pleader

Chainani, J.1. This is an application under Section 24 of the Press (Objectionable Matter) Act, 1951 (LVI. of 1951) against the order of forfeiture passed by the State Government on 7-1-1954, forfeiting a book entitled 'Dampatya...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2010

Smt. Kamalamma W/O Bomme Gowda and ors Vs. the State of Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-29-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : SRI R.DEVDAS, AGA; SRI K.KRISHNA, ADV; SRI ANANT MANDGI, SR.ADV; SRI R.B.S. NAIK, ADVs

1. The petitioners claim to have lost their properties on account of the compulsory acquisition of lands for the benefit of the respondent Nos.4 and 5.2. Sri K.S. Narayanaswamy, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2025

M/S Sapthagiri Shelters vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-05-2025

-1- RIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.23086 OF 2022 (LB-BMP) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.16675/2018, 10970/2020, 12204/2020, -2- -3- -4-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2025

Mukesh Jain vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-22-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.20578 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:1. MUKESH JAIN S/O. SRI. CHANDAN MAL JAIN,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2025

Dr. K. V. Chidananda vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12592 OF 2023 BETWEEN:1. DR. K.V.CHIDANANDAS/O DR. KURUNJI VENKATARAMANA GOWDA AGED ABOUT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2002

Vikas Deshpande Vs. Bar Council of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 35(3), 35B and 38

Reported in : AIR2003SC308; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)777; 2003(1)AWC422(SC); 95(2003)CLT273(SC); 101(2002)DLT164(SC); JT2002(9)SC619; (2003)1MLJ184(SC); (2003)1SCC384; 2003(1)LC331(SC); 2003(2)WL

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

Bhan, J.1. This appeal has been filed by Vikas Deshpande, advocate hereinafter referred to as 'the appellant', under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961, [for short 'the Act'] against the final order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial