Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a l dave · Page 1 of about 144 results (0.069 seconds)

Oct 07 2011

Jalaram Education Trust Sanchalit B.ED.College vs. National Council fo ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2011

Subject : Education

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value =...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2011

Uma Education Trust Sanchalit B.ED. College vs. National Council for T ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2011

Subject : Education

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2011

Jashbhai R Patel Vs. Chotu Morarbhai Patel and 2

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Oct 07 2011

Shri Yogananda Education and Charitable Trust Sanchalit vs. National C ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2011

Subject : Education

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2011

Shri Morvi Sarvajanik Kelavni Mandal Sanchalit Mskm B ED vs. National ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2011

Subject : Education

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1999

Gomaram Somaram Jat Vs. U.H. Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-12-1999

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Phychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 53(1), 53A and 67

Reported in : (2000)1GLR99

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Dave, Addl Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 2

A.L. Dave, J.1. Rule. Mr. S.P.Dave, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of respondents.2. Heard Mrs. Unwala, learned advocate for the revisioner and Mr.S.P.Dave, learned APP for the State. The revisioner herein challenges the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1999

Damjibhai Bachubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-02-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : 2000CriLJ669

Advocate for Respondent : Umesh Trivedi, Addl. Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1

A.L. Dave, J.1. Heard Mr. C.L. Soni, learned advocate for the revisioner and Mr. Trivedi, learned APP. 2. The revisioner herein challenges the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Rajkot in exercise of powers under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1999

Smt. M. Sivakami Vs. Bharat Ginning and Oil Mill Factory

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-28-1999

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141 and 141(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1043

Advocate for Respondent : Mehul Shah, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and; Maulin Rawal, Adv. and;

A.L. Dave, J.1. Rule. Mr. Mehul Shah, the learned advocate for respondent No. 1, Mr. Maulin Rawal, learned APP and Mr. S. P. Dave, learned APP for respondent No. 2 waive service of rule. This group...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2002

Arvind Mills Limited and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-07-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 190, 202 and 482

Reported in : (2002)3GLR624

Advocate for Respondent : A.D. Oza, P.P. for Respondent No. 1,; Shanti Bhushan and;

A.L. Dave, J.1. Rule. Mr. A.D. Oza, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service on behalf of the State in all the matters. Mr. S.V. Raju waives service on behalf of the respondent-original complainant in Special Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1999

Raimal Budharam Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2707

Advocate for Respondent : Maulin Rawal, Addl Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and 5 and; J.M. Panchal, Adv. for Responden

A.L. Dave, J.1. Heard Mr.Parmar, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr.J.M.Panchal for respondents No.2 & 3 and Mr.Maulin Rawal for respondent No.1 & 5.2. Mr.Parmar's case is that respondent No.2 has falsely implicated the petitioner in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.