Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a kothandaraman · Page 1 of about 181 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 1982

Amitkumar Amichand by Partner S. Mohanlal Vs. Jawanthraj and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-07-1982

Subject : TenancyCivil

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ353

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Kesava Iyengar

S. Mohan, J.1. The tenant is the revision-petitioner and the revision arises out of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of I960), hereinafter referred to as the Act.2. The respondents (landlords) filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1990

Gautam Menon Vs. Sucharitha Gautam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 25

Reported in : I(1992)DMC79; (1991)IMLJ212

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Goklaney, Adv.

Lakshmanan, J.1. This petition is filed by the husband against his wife, the respondent herein, under Sections 3 and 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and Order 21, Rules 1 and 2 of Original Side...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2003

K. Velmurugan and Mrs. V. Rajabakkiyam Ammal Vs. R. Kannan (Died) and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-23-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 41; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54, 55(5) and 58; Registration Act - Sections 57; Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988; Registration Rules - Rule 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 34, Rules 4 and 6

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ666

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Kothandaraman, Adv. for R2 - 7 and ;N.A. for R8 to 12

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. Defendants 2 and 3 are in appeal before us. They have filed the appeal challenging the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 197 of 1985 dated 13.9.1988 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 06 1999

M/S. New India Assurance Company Ltd., Madras-2 Vs. R.K. Geetha and An ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-06-1999

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Sections 2 , 11-1 and 95(2)

Reported in : 2000ACJ704; 1999(1)CTC752; (1999)IIMLJ695

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.N. Kothandaraman, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggrieved by the Award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madras, in M.A.C.T.O.P.No. 1641 of 1986, New India Assurance Company Limited, Madras-2, has filed the above appeal questioning its liability.2. First respondent herein/claimant therein filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2012

The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. the P ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-13-2012

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 17B, 11A; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.P.S.Kothandaraman, Adv.

W.P.No.19998 of 2008 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent pertaining to his Award made in I.D.No.34 of 2004 dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2000

Vee Cee Yes Granites Chennai, Rep. by Its Partner K.C. Ragunathan Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-10-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 4, 9 and 10 -- Order 2, Rule 2 (3) and Order 8, Rule 6 (2) (A); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 -- Sections 3 (1), 17 and 18; Constitution of India -- Articles 226 and 227; Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act -- Sections 34

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas37(Mad); 2000(2)CTC664; (2000)IIMLJ392

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Kothandaraman, Adv.

ORDER1. Vee Cee Yes Granites, Chennai, the plaintiff/applicant has filed this petition under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to stay the proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Chennai. 2. The prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1981

K.P. Sivasundara Pillai Vs. C.P. Jagannatha thevar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-17-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1976 - Sections 3(L) and 3(O)

Reported in : AIR1983Mad34

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Kothandaraman and ;Sivaji, Advs. for Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. The proceedings, which are challenged by the petitioner in this writ petitioner. are those of the authorities exercising powers under the Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1976 (Act 31 of 1976), hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1972

Padmasani Ammal Vs. Devaraja Pillai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-01-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madras City Tenants Protection Act - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 6 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rules 7 and 19

Reported in : AIR1973Mad294; (1973)1MLJ26

1. The respondent in the above appeals and civil revision petition was the defendant in O. S. No. 3185 of 1960 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras. The suit was filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2009

M. Virupaksha Dattatreya Gowda S/o. B.R.D. Gowda presently working as ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-26-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules, 2007 - Rules 1(2), 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 6(1) to 6(4), 6(5), 6(6), 6(7) to 6(10), 7, 9, 12(2), 13, 23, 23A, 24A, 26, 26(2) and 34 ; Regional Rural Banks (Appointment and Promotion of Officers and other employees) Rules, 1988; Rajasthan Service of Engineers (Building and Roads Branch) Rules, 1954; Karnataka Administrative Services (Tahsildars) Recruitment (Special) Rules, 1975; Mysore Public Works, Engineering Department Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1960; Constitution of India - Articles 233, 234, 235, 237, 309 and 320; Andhra Pradesh Registration and Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2009(3)ALT240

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;D.V. Sitharam Murthy, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.The petitioners twelve in number are the Senior Civil Judges, working in Andhra Pradesh Judiciary, seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2006

Shri Nagendu Bhattacharya and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Secretariat Service Rules, 1962 - Rules 6 and 6A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT301; 2006(88)DRJ306

Advocate for Respondent : Alakh Kumar, Adv. for respondent No. 1

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The Writ petitioners in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek quashing of Rule 5 of the Recruitment Rules to the post of Assistants, framed on 4.7.2003, as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial