Advanced Search Results

Swati Vasant Patil and anr. Vs. Kandivli Education Society and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(3) and 3(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR333; 2002(3)BomCR51

Advocate for Respondent : S.J. Panickar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;Armin Kalyanram, A.G.P., for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and ;C.H. Gangan, Adv. for respondent No. 5

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The petitioners herein are two teachers working in the Junior College run by the 1st respondent-Education Society. The 2nd respondent is the Headmistress of the Junior College run by the said Education Society....

Nirav Deepak Jobanputra Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR309; 2002(5)BomCR596; (2002)4BOMLR806; 2002(4)MhLj125

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Kumbhakhoni, Special Counsel, ;Geetanjali Prabhu, ;Manjiri Shah and ;Kalyanram, A.G.Ps.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Heard Mr. Thorat and Mr. Vashi the learned counsel for the petitioners and the Special Counsel Mr. Kumbhakhoni withMs. Geetanjali Prabhu, Ms. Manjiri Shah and Ms. A. Kalyanram the learned A. G. Ps....

Dr. Iyer Nikhil Lakshman and ors. Vs. Director of Medical Education an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses Rules, 2003 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR2; 2004(2)MhLj65

Advocate for Respondent : Kalyanram, A.G.P.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent Rule made returnable forthwith.2. Petitioners seek the following reliefs in this petition :--(a) That a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction be issued,...

Surendrakumar S. Surana Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2(10), 33 and 33(1); Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Sales on Cash) Register Rules

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1017; 2002(3)BomCR343; 2002(1)MhLj504

Advocate for Respondent : K. Kalyanram, Adv.

1. This Writ Petition challenges the order of suspension of the licence issued to the petitioner under the Bombay Police Act for running a place of public entertainment. The petitioner carries on the business of a...

Vivek PravIn Tilwani (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR850; 2003(5)BomCR477; 2003(4)MhLj826

Advocate for Respondent : A. Kalyanram, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

R. M. Lodha, J. 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, Mr. Pungalia, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is not pressing the prayer to declare the merit list prepared for the post of Junior...

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 266; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A and 10B(3); Indian Medical Councils Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 10A(1), 10A(2), 10A(7), 10B, 10B(1), 10C, 20 and 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jamdar, Mrs. Samant

H. L. Gokhale, J.1. All the writ petitions in Group (A) above invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India raise common questions with respect to the correctness and legality of the Maharashtra Health Sciences Common...

Varalakshmi Vs. C. Hanumantha Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rules 1, 9 to 19, 19A, 19A(2) and 20(A); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 123

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD496; 1998(5)ALT749

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Nalin Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. The petitioner has filed this civil revision petition aggrieved by the order of dismissal of her Interlocutory application No. 105/1991 in OP No.40/1990 dated 25th September, 1995 on the file of the...

The Executive Officer, T.T. Devasthanams Tirupathi Vs. K. Ramachandra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 68D

Reported in : AIR1966AP112

Advocate for Respondent : P. Babulu Reddy, ;E.P.K. Sikhamani, Advs., ;P. Ramachandra Reddy and ;E. Kalyanram, Advs. ;P.R. Ramachandra Rao, Adv. ;in W.A. No. 72 of 1963 and Govt. Pleader

Chandra Reddy, C.J.1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment of our learned brother Justice Jaganmohan Reddy in W. P. 904/61 quashing the order of the State Transport Authority granting two permits to each of...

Chittoor District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. Vegetols Ltd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCompany

Acts : Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932 - Sections 61; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 129; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 536(2)

Reported in : [1968]38CompCas687(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ramachandra Reddy, ;E. Kalyanram, Advs. in Application No. 83 of 1965 and ;T. Lakshmaiah, Official Liquidator for 3rd Respondent in Application Nos. 79 and 122 of 1965

ORDER OF SINGLE JUDGENarasimhan, J. 1. In Company Application No. 79 of 1965 the Chittoor District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., Chittoor, is the applicant and has preferred the same against the order of the official liquidator...

Belgees Begum Etc. Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Writ Proceedings (Andhra Pradesh) Rules, 1977 - Rule 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 152 - Order 20, Rules 1, 2 and 3 - Order 41, Rules 30 and 31

Reported in : AIR1994AP316; 1994(1)ALT649

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader, A. Rangacharyalu, S.C. and ;E. KalyanRam, Adv.

ORDERThese two writ petitions have been posted before me for orders. 2. These matters arise in the following circumstances:--These two writ petitions along with Seven Civil Revision Petitions raise a common point. These matters were heard...