Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a kakani · Page 1 of about 47 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 06 2001

C. Rajendra Prasad Vs. G.M. Corporation and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-06-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Orders 30, 39 and 40, Rules 1 and 2; Companies Act, 1956; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 108; Constitution of India - Article 54(2)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALD181; 2001(4)ALT754

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Venugopal and ;Mr. T. Surya Satish, Advs.

ORDER1. This revision arises out of the order dated 6-4-2001 in CMA No. 15 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the 1st Additional Chief Judge. City Civil Court, Secunderabad, allowing the appeal filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2004

M.E.L. Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited Vs. Divisional Jo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-2004

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 35

Reported in : 2004(3)MhLj757

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Patel, Assistant Government Pleader in W.P. No. 4448 of 2003, ;A.S. Sonare, Assistant Government Pleader in W.P. No. 4449 of 2003 for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;D.M. Kakani, Adv. for Responden

B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.Shri D.B. Patel, learned A.G.P. waives service on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Writ Petition No. 4448/03 and Shri A.S. Sonare, learned A.G.P. waives service...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Rama Anandrao Khobragade Vs. Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Boa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR550; 2007(3)BomCR984

Advocate for Respondent : Kakani, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. By this Writ Petition, the petitioner-employee has challenged the order dated 14.7.1995 passed by the Industrial Court, Amravati directing the employer (present respondent Nos. 1 to 3) to give promotion to the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 20 2009

Supreme Steels Vs. Shri D.H. Deshmukh and Dadarao Sarvaji Sukhdeve

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-2009

Subject : Labour and IndustrialMRTP

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30(2); Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 78(1)(D); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR80

Advocate for Respondent : D.M. Kakani, Adv. for Respondent No. 2. and ;Learned A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Petitioner - Employer has challenged the order dated 16.02.2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Nagpur in complaint ULP No. 282/1996 declaring that, by issuing charge sheet dated 10.01.1996, it had indulged in unfair...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2006

Pyar Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-05-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1997 - Sections 29; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 303, 304, 304(1), 304(2), 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 397, 450 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 22 and 22(1); Madhya Pradesh Legal Services Authorities Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 33 and 33(2)

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1354; 2006(2)MPHT331; 2006(1)MPLJ395

Advocate for Respondent : A. Kakani, Govt. Adv.

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. This is a revision under Sections 397, 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short hereinafter referred as Code), challenging the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain and Special Judge (NDPS Act),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2006

Satish Kumar Sahu and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 406, 498A and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 177, 178, 178(C) and 482

Reported in : I(2006)DMC754; 2006(2)MPLJ186

Advocate for Respondent : A. Kakani, G.A.

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. Heard finally at the motion hearing stage with the consent of both parties As directed on last date of hearing Mr. A. Kakani submitted the case diary of the case of Crime No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2006

Gurmeet Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 177 and 178; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -Sections 34, 406, 498A and 506;

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1390; 2006(2)MPHT289; 2006(1)MPLJ250

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Kakani, G.A.

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 2-3-2005, passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore in Cri. Case No. 864 of 2004, whereby the application filed by applicant accused under Section 177 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2006

Badrilal Gupta Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405 and 409

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1375

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Kakani, G.A.

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. This revision is directed against the judgment and order of conviction dated 25-1-2000, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 1999 by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Barwani, whereby confirming the conviction and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2010

Madhav S/O Sitaramji Ramteke, and ors. Vs. Central Cables Limited, and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-01-2010

Subject : Minimum Wages

Acts : Minimum Wages Act - Section 20, 21, 27,

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.T.R.Kankale, Adv.

1. Matter is partheard. Today respective counsel have concluded their arguments.2. During arguments, my attention has been invited to the orders of this court dated 20/11/2008, by which this court has directed Government to file affidavit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2015

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Nagpur and Wardha District Mathadi a ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Oct-01-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pillai, Mr. Ghate, Mr. Kakani, Mr. Dubey

S.B. Shukre, J. 1. Heard. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. By this petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner is that the order dated 12/08/2011 passed by the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial