Advanced Search Results

Miss Tumnyak Ete and ors. Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4) and 226

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Singh, Sr. Govt. Adv. for Respondents 1 to 4 and P.K. Tiwari, Adv. for Respondent 5

L.A. Ansari, J. 1. Claiming to be perplexed at the decision of the State Government and challenging the virus and constitutionality of the State Cabinet's decision to select and nominate candidates for pursuing the courses of...

Shree Mahanth Baba Hathi Ram Pajawa Ramlila Committee and anr. Vs. Reg ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860

Reported in : (2001)1UPLBEC224

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Tiwari and ;Arun Tandon, Advs.

ORDERO.P. Garg, J.1. These are two connected with petitions in which a dispute regarding the election of office bearers of the Committee of Management of Shree Mahant Baba Hathi Ram Pajawa Ramlila Committee, Rani Mandi, Allahabad,...

Mejum Karga Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Arunachal Pradesh Secretariat Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 162, 309, 320 and 320(3)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Tiwari, T. Pertin and B. Banerjee, Advs.

B.K. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner, an Upper Division Clerk (UDC) working in the department of Rural Development, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, has, by way of this writ proceeding, challenged the legality and validity of the fixation...

The Chairman, M.P. Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Ram Naresh Gautam

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96; Minimum Wages Act

Reported in : III(2006)ACC763; 2006(1)MPHT495

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Tiwari, Adv.

S.L. Jain, J.1. Invoking appellate jurisdiction of this Court under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, appellant M.P. Electricity Board has filed this appeal challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the judgment...

Capt. (Retd.) R.C. Verma Vs. Brgd. (Retd.) R.S. Thapar and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11 and 12

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi320

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Tiwari, Adv.

ORDER1. Capt. Retired R.C. Verma wants removal of the arbitrator namely Brig. Retd. R. S. Thapar, respondent No. 1 herein. The arbitrator was appointed by Chairman, Army Welfare Housing Organisation (hereinafter called as 'respondent No. 2')....

Dhiraj Narang and ors. Vs. M.C.D. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Municipal Corporation of Delhi Act

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ611

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Tiwari, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ; Pawan Mathur, Adv. for Respondent/DDA

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. These ten petitioners who are the residents of D Block, New Friends Colony have filed the present writ petition in the nature of mandamus seeking removal of office of Delhi Jal Board i.e.,...

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Rana and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279 and 304A

Reported in : 2009ACJ287; 2008(101)DRJ645

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tiwari, Adv.

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. The present appeal preferred under Section 173 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, arises out of an award dated 24th April, 2007 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, whereby the Tribunal awarded a...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gurucharanjit Kaur

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Sharma, P.K. Tiwari and D.K. Sharma, Advs.

H.K. Sema, J.1. Heard Dr. B.P. Todi, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Mr. P.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the Caveator-respondent. The Caveat is discharged.2. Factual matrix that emerged is that the petitioners were appointed...

Y.C. Simhadri, Vice Chancellor, B.H.U. and ors. Vs. Deen Bandhu Pathak

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 215, 216 and 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 17 and 55; Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 14, 19 and 23; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 435 and 439; Government of India, 1935 - Sections 223; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 106, 108 and 108(2); Charter Act, 1861 - Sections 1, 13 and 14; Indian Independence Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 7 and 8; United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2688; (2001)3UPLBEC2373

Advocate for Respondent : Assem Kumar Rai, ;Dinesh Rai, ;D.K. Tiwari and ;Pankaj Srivastava, Advs.

Shyamal Kumar Sen, C.J.1. Heard Mr. V. B. Upadhyaya, learned senior advocate assisted by Mr. V. K. Upadhyaya, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr. D. K. Tiwari and Pankaj Srivastava, learned advocates for the respondent.2....

Panch Ram and anr. Vs. Ram Prasad Lodhi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : I(1997)DMC20

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tiwary, Adv.

Rajeev Gupta, J.1. An innocent, hapless and meek child Panch Ram, after having lost his identity as son, though illegitimate, of non-petitioner Ram Prasad Lodhi, in the corridors of Court's below, has knocked the doors of...