Advanced Search Results
Bureau of Indian Standards Emp. Union and ors. Vs. Dir. Gen., Bureau o ...
Delhi
Apr-21-1999
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1999IIIAD(Delhi)789; 80(1999)DLT35
Shri B.K. Sood, Adv.
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner No.1 is a Union and petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 are employees of the Bureau of Indian Standards. They have prayed for the following reliefs: 'So, under the above facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.P. State Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. M/S. G.D. Khanna and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
May-19-2011
Tenancy
The Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act 1987 - Section 21
Mr. N.K. Sood, Adv.
1. This petition is directed against the judgment dated 23.7.2009 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Fast Track Court, Shimla in Rent Appeal No. 54-S/14 of 2008. 2. Material facts necessary for the adjudication of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-01-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(2) and 271(1)
[1997]224ITR82(P& H)
N.K. Sood, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Pursuant to the direction given by the High Court on November 18, 1977 (see ) in I. T. C. No. 113 and I. T. C. No. 114 of 1977, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.N. Beri and Sons (Huf)
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-17-1995
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256
[1996]218ITR53(P& H)
N.K. Sood, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. These four petitions have been filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), for directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajwant Singh and Co.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-29-1993
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256; Excise Act
(1993)114CTR(P& H)25; [1994]209ITR539(P& H)
N.K. Sood, Adv.
A.L. Bahri, J.1. The Revenue has moved this court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar, to submit the statement of the case and to refer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiri Kant Harnam Dass Attar Chand Co. Vs. the Assessing Authority, and ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-25-1982
Sales Tax
[1982]50STC391(P& H)
L.K. Sood, Adv.
I.S. Tiwana, J.1. The petitioner-firm impugns the order of assessment(annexure Pl) dated 31st August, 1971, relating to the year 196768, passed against it by the Assessing Authority, Ludhiana, and its affirmance by the Deputy Excise and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Iron Industries Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-04-1989
Sales Tax
Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 6(1) and 16
[1990]77STC433(P& H)
S.K. Sood, D.A.
Jai Singh Sekhon, J.1. The assessee, Rama Iron Industries, Hansi, is engaged in the manufacture of cart wheels and is a registered dealer under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskElectric Construction and Equipment Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-21-1989
Sales Tax
General Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3
[1990]77STC424(P& H)
S.K. Sood, D.A.
Jai Singh Sekhon, J.1. The Sales Tax Tribunal, Haryana, Chandigarh, had referred the following question for the opinion of this Court under Section 42 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, at the instance of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaryana Iron and Steel Rolling Mills Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-04-1989
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6A and 9
[1990]77STC211(P& H)
S.K. Sood, D.A.
Jai Singh Sekhon, J.1. The Sales Tax Tribunal, Haryana (herein after referred to as 'the Tribunal'), had referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this Court :(i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh Vs. Puran Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-25-1993
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
(1994)106PLR105
L.K. Sood, Adv.
Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. The petitioner, who is the defendant in the suit, is the real brother, of the respondent who is the plaintiff in that suit. The facts of the case are that the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »